Cost-effectiveness analysis of the early transition from microscopic to biportal endoscopic unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of microscopic unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression (ULBD) and biportal endoscopic ULBD during the early transition phase from microscopic to endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent single-level lumbar ULBD between January 2017 and December 2023 at a single tertiary center. Clinical outcomes included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension index values. Primary and secondary costs were assessed, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was calculated, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated with bootstrap analysis. Cost-effectiveness was compared at 12 months postoperatively. A total of 69 patients were included (39 microscopic ULBD and 30 endoscopic ULBD). Both groups showed postoperative improvement in Numeric Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension at 12 months compared with baseline, with no statistically significant differences between groups. Total costs and QALY gain at 12 months did not differ significantly between the groups. The observed incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -$2816.36/QALY. Exploratory bootstrap and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve analyses showed a favorable numerical direction for endoscopic ULBD; however, these findings were interpreted as descriptive estimates of uncertainty rather than evidence of economic superiority. In this early transition phase, endoscopic ULBD demonstrated comparable 12-month clinical and economic outcomes relative to microscopic ULBD. The exploratory cost-effectiveness findings should be interpreted cautiously and should not be considered evidence of economic superiority. Further large-scale, prospective studies with concurrent comparison groups and longer follow-up are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000050400
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the early transition from microscopic to biportal endoscopic unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression

Seunghoon Lee, Fon-Yih Tsuang, Chi Heon Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee et al.
Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the early transition from microscopic to biportal endoscopic unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression

Seunghoon Lee, Fon-Yih Tsuang, Chi Heon Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Hangeul Park, Jungbo Sim, Noah Hong, W. Kim, Sung-Eun Kwon, Ho Sung Myeong, Jun-Hoe Kim
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of microscopic unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression (ULBD) and biportal endoscopic ULBD during the early transition phase from microscopic to endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent single-level lumbar ULBD between January 2017 and December 2023 at a single tertiary center. Clinical outcomes included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension index values. Primary and secondary costs were assessed, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was calculated, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated with bootstrap analysis. Cost-effectiveness was compared at 12 months postoperatively. A total of 69 patients were included (39 microscopic ULBD and 30 endoscopic ULBD). Both groups showed postoperative improvement in Numeric Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension at 12 months compared with baseline, with no statistically significant differences between groups. Total costs and QALY gain at 12 months did not differ significantly between the groups. The observed incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -$2816.36/QALY. Exploratory bootstrap and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve analyses showed a favorable numerical direction for endoscopic ULBD; however, these findings were interpreted as descriptive estimates of uncertainty rather than evidence of economic superiority. In this early transition phase, endoscopic ULBD demonstrated comparable 12-month clinical and economic outcomes relative to microscopic ULBD. The exploratory cost-effectiveness findings should be interpreted cautiously and should not be considered evidence of economic superiority. Further large-scale, prospective studies with concurrent comparison groups and longer follow-up are warranted.

MedicineVol. 105(34)
Seoul National University (KR), Seoul Metropolitan Government (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), SNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (KR), Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital (KR), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital (KR), Jeju National University Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.