The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and Youth Depression – In Context

OBJECTIVE: The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) system is a valuable framework for researchers seeking to understand the mechanisms underlying psychopathology. Although RDoC provides guidance for studying biological and behavioral mechanisms, it offers relatively little direction for incorporating environmental variables into study designs. Consequently, RDoC studies may overlook or ignore environmental context, reducing the likelihood of evaluating possible interactions of biological and environmental processes. METHOD: The current review investigated the extent to which studies utilizing the RDoC framework have included environmental factors when evaluating mechanisms of depression in youth. RESULTS: Results showed that environmental variables have been measured infrequently, with economic instability measured most often (36% of studies). Additionally, studies of youth adverse childhood events, parental psychosocial factors, and social and community context often have been analyzed as substantive variables of interest, whereas economic instability and parent education primarily have been used as covariates, when included at all. Distinct patterns were identified depending on the age group under study, with generally lower rates of inclusion of environmental variables in studies of adolescents as compared to children. CONCLUSIONS: We provide recommendations for how to incorporate environmental context into RDoC studies to further our understanding of the development of depression in youth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2026.2718199
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and Youth Depression – In Context

Sofia Olivares, Judy Garber, George Abitante, Alexa Scher
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and Youth Depression – In Context

Sofia Olivares, Judy Garber, George Abitante, Alexa Scher
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) system is a valuable framework for researchers seeking to understand the mechanisms underlying psychopathology. Although RDoC provides guidance for studying biological and behavioral mechanisms, it offers relatively little direction for incorporating environmental variables into study designs. Consequently, RDoC studies may overlook or ignore environmental context, reducing the likelihood of evaluating possible interactions of biological and environmental processes. METHOD: The current review investigated the extent to which studies utilizing the RDoC framework have included environmental factors when evaluating mechanisms of depression in youth. RESULTS: Results showed that environmental variables have been measured infrequently, with economic instability measured most often (36% of studies). Additionally, studies of youth adverse childhood events, parental psychosocial factors, and social and community context often have been analyzed as substantive variables of interest, whereas economic instability and parent education primarily have been used as covariates, when included at all. Distinct patterns were identified depending on the age group under study, with generally lower rates of inclusion of environmental variables in studies of adolescents as compared to children. CONCLUSIONS: We provide recommendations for how to incorporate environmental context into RDoC studies to further our understanding of the development of depression in youth.

Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Vanderbilt University (US)
National Institute of Mental Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.