Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Osteoporotic Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction Unstable intertrochanteric fractures in osteoporotic elderly patients are associated with substantial morbidity, delayed mobilization, and risk of fixation failure. The optimal surgical treatment remains debated. This study evaluated functional outcomes and implant-related complications in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with either primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) or proximal femoral nail (PFN) fixation. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care orthopedic center between April 2022 and June 2025. Sixty patients aged 60-80 years with unstable intertrochanteric fractures (Evans types III and IV) were included. Patients underwent either cemented BHA (n=30) or PFN fixation (n=30) as determined by the treating surgical team. Primary outcome measures included time to full weight-bearing (FWB), Harris Hip Score (HHS) at one year, and revision surgery rate. Secondary outcomes included Parker-Palmer Mobility Score and limb length discrepancy (LLD). Results Patients treated with BHA achieved FWB significantly earlier than those treated with PFN (5.87±3.97 days vs. 12.83±1.62 days; p<0.001). At the one-year follow-up, the BHA group demonstrated significantly higher mean HHS (89.44±4.69 vs. 85.79±8.26; p=0.048) and Parker-Palmer Mobility Scores (8.15±0.95 vs. 7.38±0.86; p=0.002). Revision surgery was required in one patient (3.3%) in the BHA group and four patients (13.3%) in the PFN group. LLD greater than 10 mm was observed in three patients (10%) following BHA and in none of the PFN patients. Conclusions In this prospective observational study, patients managed with primary cemented BHA demonstrated earlier postoperative mobilization and better functional outcomes at one year compared with those treated with PFN fixation. These findings suggest that hemiarthroplasty may be a useful treatment option in selected elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures where rapid rehabilitation is a major treatment objective.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.114899
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Osteoporotic Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Devkant Meena, Kaushlesh Sharma, Anurag Sharma, Shiv Prakash Sharma et al.
Cureus
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Osteoporotic Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Devkant Meena, Kaushlesh Sharma, Anurag Sharma, Shiv Prakash Sharma, Manish Mehta
article en

Abstract

Introduction Unstable intertrochanteric fractures in osteoporotic elderly patients are associated with substantial morbidity, delayed mobilization, and risk of fixation failure. The optimal surgical treatment remains debated. This study evaluated functional outcomes and implant-related complications in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with either primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) or proximal femoral nail (PFN) fixation. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care orthopedic center between April 2022 and June 2025. Sixty patients aged 60-80 years with unstable intertrochanteric fractures (Evans types III and IV) were included. Patients underwent either cemented BHA (n=30) or PFN fixation (n=30) as determined by the treating surgical team. Primary outcome measures included time to full weight-bearing (FWB), Harris Hip Score (HHS) at one year, and revision surgery rate. Secondary outcomes included Parker-Palmer Mobility Score and limb length discrepancy (LLD). Results Patients treated with BHA achieved FWB significantly earlier than those treated with PFN (5.87±3.97 days vs. 12.83±1.62 days; p<0.001). At the one-year follow-up, the BHA group demonstrated significantly higher mean HHS (89.44±4.69 vs. 85.79±8.26; p=0.048) and Parker-Palmer Mobility Scores (8.15±0.95 vs. 7.38±0.86; p=0.002). Revision surgery was required in one patient (3.3%) in the BHA group and four patients (13.3%) in the PFN group. LLD greater than 10 mm was observed in three patients (10%) following BHA and in none of the PFN patients. Conclusions In this prospective observational study, patients managed with primary cemented BHA demonstrated earlier postoperative mobilization and better functional outcomes at one year compared with those treated with PFN fixation. These findings suggest that hemiarthroplasty may be a useful treatment option in selected elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures where rapid rehabilitation is a major treatment objective.

Cureus
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Osteoporotic Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study — Devkant Meena, Kaushlesh Sharma, et al. · Cureus (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS