Gender, power, and tokenism in nature-based solutions to climate change

Nature-based Climate Solutions (NbCS) are widely promoted for climate change adaptation and mitigation. While a growing body of literature has examined the prospects and challenges of NbCS, less attention has been paid to issues of gendered participation and equity. Using an intersectional feminist political ecology lens and qualitative data from Ghana, this paper addresses this knowledge gap. The findings demonstrate that participation in NbCS is shaped by intersecting power dynamics, including land tenure, wealth, and leadership status, rather than gender alone. Furthermore, while implementing organizations often claim to take gender equity seriously, the approaches taken are highly tokenistic. They prioritize quantitative counts in women's enrollment over targeting and addressing the root causes of gender inequality. These findings contribute to the climate and development literature by showing the need to take gender justice and intersectional inequalities seriously in the rollout of NbCS. We argue that advancing gender-transformative NbCS requires sustained engagement with intersectional power relations across all stages of project design, implementation, monitoring, and adaptive management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate and Development
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2026.2712491
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender, power, and tokenism in nature-based solutions to climate change

Hanson Nyantakyi‐Frimpong, Stephanie Efua Yamoah
Climate and Development
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Gender, power, and tokenism in nature-based solutions to climate change

Hanson Nyantakyi‐Frimpong, Stephanie Efua Yamoah
article en

Abstract

Nature-based Climate Solutions (NbCS) are widely promoted for climate change adaptation and mitigation. While a growing body of literature has examined the prospects and challenges of NbCS, less attention has been paid to issues of gendered participation and equity. Using an intersectional feminist political ecology lens and qualitative data from Ghana, this paper addresses this knowledge gap. The findings demonstrate that participation in NbCS is shaped by intersecting power dynamics, including land tenure, wealth, and leadership status, rather than gender alone. Furthermore, while implementing organizations often claim to take gender equity seriously, the approaches taken are highly tokenistic. They prioritize quantitative counts in women's enrollment over targeting and addressing the root causes of gender inequality. These findings contribute to the climate and development literature by showing the need to take gender justice and intersectional inequalities seriously in the rollout of NbCS. We argue that advancing gender-transformative NbCS requires sustained engagement with intersectional power relations across all stages of project design, implementation, monitoring, and adaptive management.

Climate and Development
University of Denver (US)
Gender equality, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.