Decolonial reflexivity as (un)learning: groundwork for Indigenising Business Education curricula

Business Education remains overwhelmingly shaped by Anglo-American epistemologies that marginalise First Peoples knowledges and reproduce colonial assumptions about knowledge, value, and economic life. While calls to Indigenise curriculum have become increasingly common, they often overlook the prior work required of non-Indigenous educators themselves. This paper argues that decolonial reflexivity is a necessary precursor to any efforts to respectfully and purposefully Indigenise the curriculum. Drawing on a dialogic collaboration between First Peoples and non-Indigenous scholars, we examine how colonial assumptions can be recognised, unsettled, and transformed through reflexive practice. We conceptualise this work as confronting the ‘colonial load’ carried within educators, curricula, and institutions, and demonstrate how dialogic reflexivity can move ‘Indigenisation’ beyond symbolic inclusion towards epistemic and pedagogical transformation. In doing so, the paper offers both a conceptual framework and a practical orientation for reimagining education in ways that better support First Peoples’ self-determination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching in Higher Education
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2026.2717200
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decolonial reflexivity as (un)learning: groundwork for Indigenising Business Education curricula

Andrew Wear, Samantha Cooms, Mark Jones
Teaching in Higher Education
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Decolonial reflexivity as (un)learning: groundwork for Indigenising Business Education curricula

Andrew Wear, Samantha Cooms, Mark Jones
article en

Abstract

Business Education remains overwhelmingly shaped by Anglo-American epistemologies that marginalise First Peoples knowledges and reproduce colonial assumptions about knowledge, value, and economic life. While calls to Indigenise curriculum have become increasingly common, they often overlook the prior work required of non-Indigenous educators themselves. This paper argues that decolonial reflexivity is a necessary precursor to any efforts to respectfully and purposefully Indigenise the curriculum. Drawing on a dialogic collaboration between First Peoples and non-Indigenous scholars, we examine how colonial assumptions can be recognised, unsettled, and transformed through reflexive practice. We conceptualise this work as confronting the ‘colonial load’ carried within educators, curricula, and institutions, and demonstrate how dialogic reflexivity can move ‘Indigenisation’ beyond symbolic inclusion towards epistemic and pedagogical transformation. In doing so, the paper offers both a conceptual framework and a practical orientation for reimagining education in ways that better support First Peoples’ self-determination.

Teaching in Higher Education
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.