Fluid intake behaviors and hydration biomarkers across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling females

Evidence supports an impact of exogenous sex hormones on body water regulation, but research on endogenous hormones is limited. This study assessed whether estradiol and progesterone explain associations between fluid intake and hydration biomarkers in females. Seventeen females (mean ± SD; age, 25 ± 5y; height, 163.0 ± 7.3 cm; body mass, 71.3 ± 24.4 kg; body fat, 24.6 ± 7.1%) completed assessments of total water intake (TWI) and 24-h urinary hydration biomarkers during three menstrual-cycle windows (Days 4–6, 12–14, and 19–21 from the onset of menstruation). Estradiol, progesterone, and copeptin (surrogate of arginine vasopressin) were measured on day 2 of each window. Mixed-effects models examined whether within- or between-subject hormone variability improved TWI-hydration models. Progesterone partially explained the association between prior-day TWI and next-morning copeptin (χ 2 (2) = 7.75, p = 0.021, marginal R 2 = 0.198). Every 1 nmol L −1 greater progesterone concentration (within-subject) was associated with a 23 mOsm kg −1 higher next-day 24-h urine osmolality ( p = 0.028), whereas higher progesterone compared to the group mean was associated with a 20 mOsm kg −1 lower urine osmolality ( p = 0.040). Estradiol did not influence any model. Progesterone, but not estradiol, helped explain the relationships between TWI and copeptin, and between TWI and urine osmolality. Effects were not enough to influence fluid intake behaviors, suggesting hormonal variability is unlikely to confound measurements of fluid intake among females.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-67782-6
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fluid intake behaviors and hydration biomarkers across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling females

Mitchell E. Zaplatosch, Samantha J. Goldenstein, Gabrielle E. W. Giersch, William M. Adams et al.
Scientific Reports
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Fluid intake behaviors and hydration biomarkers across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling females

Mitchell E. Zaplatosch, Samantha J. Goldenstein, Gabrielle E. W. Giersch, William M. Adams, Laurie Wideman, Emily E. McGeehan, Travis Anderson
article en

Abstract

Evidence supports an impact of exogenous sex hormones on body water regulation, but research on endogenous hormones is limited. This study assessed whether estradiol and progesterone explain associations between fluid intake and hydration biomarkers in females. Seventeen females (mean ± SD; age, 25 ± 5y; height, 163.0 ± 7.3 cm; body mass, 71.3 ± 24.4 kg; body fat, 24.6 ± 7.1%) completed assessments of total water intake (TWI) and 24-h urinary hydration biomarkers during three menstrual-cycle windows (Days 4–6, 12–14, and 19–21 from the onset of menstruation). Estradiol, progesterone, and copeptin (surrogate of arginine vasopressin) were measured on day 2 of each window. Mixed-effects models examined whether within- or between-subject hormone variability improved TWI-hydration models. Progesterone partially explained the association between prior-day TWI and next-morning copeptin (χ 2 (2) = 7.75, p = 0.021, marginal R 2 = 0.198). Every 1 nmol L −1 greater progesterone concentration (within-subject) was associated with a 23 mOsm kg −1 higher next-day 24-h urine osmolality ( p = 0.028), whereas higher progesterone compared to the group mean was associated with a 20 mOsm kg −1 lower urine osmolality ( p = 0.040). Estradiol did not influence any model. Progesterone, but not estradiol, helped explain the relationships between TWI and copeptin, and between TWI and urine osmolality. Effects were not enough to influence fluid intake behaviors, suggesting hormonal variability is unlikely to confound measurements of fluid intake among females.

Scientific Reports
U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US), Loughborough University (GB), University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), Kennesaw State University (US), University of Utah (US), Fayetteville Technical Community College (US), Greensboro College (US), Michigan State University (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.