Characterization of sedentary behaviour among people with spinal cord injury

Sedentary behaviour is defined as sitting, lying, and reclining, with a low energy expenditure. These behaviours could be expected to be prevalent among people with spinal cord injury (SCI), yet the physiological, psychological, and experiential consequences of sedentary behaviour remain poorly understood in this population. Through a series of studies using mixed methodologies, the purpose was to characterize sedentary behaviour and how it effects people with SCI. Study 1 was a systematic scoping review which broadly explored and summarized the current published research on sedentary behaviour among people with SCI. Eight studies were identified which evaluated laboratory‑based sedentary behaviour interventions or assessed sedentary behaviour as an outcome. Preliminary estimates of sedentary time and effects of sedentary time were initially assessed. Study 2 was a qualitative interview study which used a semi-structured interview and reflexive thematic analysis to examine sedentary behaviour experiences and beliefs. Twelve participants with SCI (mean age ± SD; 49.2 ± 12.7 years, mean time since injury; 17.3 ± 8.6 years) described sitting and sedentary behaviour as unavoidable, and sedentary behaviour exacerbated a long list of symptoms. Five themes were generated. Study 3 was a randomized crossover trial which compared uninterrupted sedentary behaviour to sedentary behaviour interrupted by brief, vigorous, arm-crank exercise. In eight participants with SCI (mean age ± SD: 47.9 ± 13.7 years; mean time since injury ± SD: 19.6 ± 10.8 years), only pain and psychological states were improved or trended towards improvement between conditions. Study 4 was a feasibility study assessing an observational protocol combining 24-hour behaviour monitoring with commercially-available smartwatches, continuous glucose monitoring, and ecological momentary assessment. In eight participants with SCI (mean age ± SD: 47.9 ± 13.7 years; mean time since injury ± SD: 19.6 ± 10.8 years), recruitment, retention, and adherence to study protocols were feasible but the watches and monitors failed meet data yield criteria. The studies in this dissertation make a significant contribution by identifying that people with SCI are highly sedentary, and their pain and well-being may be improved by modifying sedentary behaviour. Health information related to sedentary behaviour that is tailored to people with SCI should be developed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Collections
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0455289
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of sedentary behaviour among people with spinal cord injury

Nathan T. Adams
Open Collections
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Characterization of sedentary behaviour among people with spinal cord injury

Nathan T. Adams
article en

Abstract

Sedentary behaviour is defined as sitting, lying, and reclining, with a low energy expenditure. These behaviours could be expected to be prevalent among people with spinal cord injury (SCI), yet the physiological, psychological, and experiential consequences of sedentary behaviour remain poorly understood in this population. Through a series of studies using mixed methodologies, the purpose was to characterize sedentary behaviour and how it effects people with SCI. Study 1 was a systematic scoping review which broadly explored and summarized the current published research on sedentary behaviour among people with SCI. Eight studies were identified which evaluated laboratory‑based sedentary behaviour interventions or assessed sedentary behaviour as an outcome. Preliminary estimates of sedentary time and effects of sedentary time were initially assessed. Study 2 was a qualitative interview study which used a semi-structured interview and reflexive thematic analysis to examine sedentary behaviour experiences and beliefs. Twelve participants with SCI (mean age ± SD; 49.2 ± 12.7 years, mean time since injury; 17.3 ± 8.6 years) described sitting and sedentary behaviour as unavoidable, and sedentary behaviour exacerbated a long list of symptoms. Five themes were generated. Study 3 was a randomized crossover trial which compared uninterrupted sedentary behaviour to sedentary behaviour interrupted by brief, vigorous, arm-crank exercise. In eight participants with SCI (mean age ± SD: 47.9 ± 13.7 years; mean time since injury ± SD: 19.6 ± 10.8 years), only pain and psychological states were improved or trended towards improvement between conditions. Study 4 was a feasibility study assessing an observational protocol combining 24-hour behaviour monitoring with commercially-available smartwatches, continuous glucose monitoring, and ecological momentary assessment. In eight participants with SCI (mean age ± SD: 47.9 ± 13.7 years; mean time since injury ± SD: 19.6 ± 10.8 years), recruitment, retention, and adherence to study protocols were feasible but the watches and monitors failed meet data yield criteria. The studies in this dissertation make a significant contribution by identifying that people with SCI are highly sedentary, and their pain and well-being may be improved by modifying sedentary behaviour. Health information related to sedentary behaviour that is tailored to people with SCI should be developed.

Open Collections
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.