Cost-Effectiveness of IMPRovE: A Multicomponent Intervention to Increase Adherence to Guideline Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Work-Related Mental Health Conditions in General Practice

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to increase general practitioners' (GPs) adherence to guideline recommendations for diagnosis and management of work-related mental health conditions (the Guideline). METHODS: Economic evaluation from Australian health system and societal perspectives based on data from a pragmatic hybrid III parallel cluster randomised controlled trial (IMPRovE) that ran from December 2020 to December 2022. RESULTS: The IMPRovE intervention generated a statistically significant improvement in GP adherence scores of 0.98 on 0 to 9 scale (95%CI: 0.38 to 1.58). We found no evidence for a significant between-group difference in total quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) per patient to trial-end (adjusted mean difference: -1.9, 95%CI: -24.2 to 20.3), productivity gains per patient to trial-end (adjusted mean difference: $5,818, 95%CI: -$12,346 to $23,982), or total health sector costs per patient to trial-end (adjusted mean difference: -$2,703, 95%CI: -$6,025 to $620). Under conservative assumptions, we find a significant between-group difference in total health sector cost per GP (adjusted mean difference: -$14,278, 95%CI: -$21,358, -$7,198). For improving GP adherence to the Guideline, we can be 95% confident that the IMPRovE intervention is more cost-effective than waitlist control from a health system perspective (when we set aside productivity gains). This remains the case even when improvements in GP adherence carry zero value. CONCLUSION: The IMPRovE intervention is likely to be more cost-effective than waitlist control for increasing GP adherence to Guideline recommendations. We were unable to draw strong conclusions regarding the cost-effectiveness of the IMPRovE intervention for improving patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12620001163998, November 2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10440-5
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-Effectiveness of IMPRovE: A Multicomponent Intervention to Increase Adherence to Guideline Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Work-Related Mental Health Conditions in General Practice

J. ENTICOTT, A. Collie, J. Kenardy, S. Reid et al.
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Cost-Effectiveness of IMPRovE: A Multicomponent Intervention to Increase Adherence to Guideline Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Work-Related Mental Health Conditions in General Practice

J. ENTICOTT, A. Collie, J. Kenardy, S. Reid, K. Nolidin, D. Mortimer, B. Brijnath, V. Camões-Costa, S. Chakraborty, M. Kidd, D. Mazza
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to increase general practitioners' (GPs) adherence to guideline recommendations for diagnosis and management of work-related mental health conditions (the Guideline). METHODS: Economic evaluation from Australian health system and societal perspectives based on data from a pragmatic hybrid III parallel cluster randomised controlled trial (IMPRovE) that ran from December 2020 to December 2022. RESULTS: The IMPRovE intervention generated a statistically significant improvement in GP adherence scores of 0.98 on 0 to 9 scale (95%CI: 0.38 to 1.58). We found no evidence for a significant between-group difference in total quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) per patient to trial-end (adjusted mean difference: -1.9, 95%CI: -24.2 to 20.3), productivity gains per patient to trial-end (adjusted mean difference: $5,818, 95%CI: -$12,346 to $23,982), or total health sector costs per patient to trial-end (adjusted mean difference: -$2,703, 95%CI: -$6,025 to $620). Under conservative assumptions, we find a significant between-group difference in total health sector cost per GP (adjusted mean difference: -$14,278, 95%CI: -$21,358, -$7,198). For improving GP adherence to the Guideline, we can be 95% confident that the IMPRovE intervention is more cost-effective than waitlist control from a health system perspective (when we set aside productivity gains). This remains the case even when improvements in GP adherence carry zero value. CONCLUSION: The IMPRovE intervention is likely to be more cost-effective than waitlist control for increasing GP adherence to Guideline recommendations. We were unable to draw strong conclusions regarding the cost-effectiveness of the IMPRovE intervention for improving patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12620001163998, November 2020.

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), La Trobe University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Oxford (GB), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Beyond Blue, Monash University, Queensland Government, Attorney-General's Department, Australian Government, State Insurance Regulatory Authority, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.