Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) initiated strictly within the acute ischemic stroke. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted via PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Outcomes included neurological deficit, upper limb and lower limb motor function, and functional independence. Data were synthesized using random-effects models to calculate weighted mean differences (WMD) and standardized mean differences (SMD). RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 419 participants were included. Active tDCS significantly reduced neurological deficits compared to sham stimulation (WMD=-0.86, 95% CI: -1.38 to -0.34, P=0.001). While tDCS did not significantly improve short-term or long-term upper limb function, it demonstrated a significant improvement on lower limb motor recovery (SMD=3.50, 95% CI: 2.56 to 4.44, P<0.001), which was sustained at follow-up. No significant difference was found in functional independence or safety outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: tDCS initiated in the acute phase is safe and effective for reducing neurological deficits and enhancing lower limb motor recovery. The discrepancy between lower and upper limb outcomes suggests distinct neuroplastic mechanisms, highlighting the potential of tDCS, particularly bilateral montages, as a targeted intervention for early gait rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000003134
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Zhuokun Li, Qianqian Yao, Quanye Ding, Xiantong Gao
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Zhuokun Li, Qianqian Yao, Quanye Ding, Xiantong Gao
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) initiated strictly within the acute ischemic stroke. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted via PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Outcomes included neurological deficit, upper limb and lower limb motor function, and functional independence. Data were synthesized using random-effects models to calculate weighted mean differences (WMD) and standardized mean differences (SMD). RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 419 participants were included. Active tDCS significantly reduced neurological deficits compared to sham stimulation (WMD=-0.86, 95% CI: -1.38 to -0.34, P=0.001). While tDCS did not significantly improve short-term or long-term upper limb function, it demonstrated a significant improvement on lower limb motor recovery (SMD=3.50, 95% CI: 2.56 to 4.44, P<0.001), which was sustained at follow-up. No significant difference was found in functional independence or safety outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: tDCS initiated in the acute phase is safe and effective for reducing neurological deficits and enhancing lower limb motor recovery. The discrepancy between lower and upper limb outcomes suggests distinct neuroplastic mechanisms, highlighting the potential of tDCS, particularly bilateral montages, as a targeted intervention for early gait rehabilitation.

American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Shuozhou Central Hospital (CN), Shanghai East Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.