Hidden barriers of education and artificial intelligence: rethinking equity, affordances and ability

Purpose This article investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes digital inequality in education by introducing the concepts of the AI divide and ability divide. It examines how exclusion emerges not only from unequal access or skills but from differential capacities to perceive, interpret and mobilize AI-mediated affordances. Design/methodology/approach The study is conceptual and theory-driven. It draws on transformative learning theory, critical disability studies and affordance theory to analyze how AI intersects with structural inequality, techno-ableist design and policy discourses of adaptability. Findings The analysis reveals that AI integration risks reinforcing normative expectations of capability and marginalizing learners who deviate from these standards. Denial to change introduced or mediated by AI is better understood as a socio-cultural response to disruption rather than a deficit. A co-evolutionary model of transformative education is proposed, positioning AI as a catalyst for rethinking purposes, norms and power relations in education. Originality/value The article advances the concept of the ability divide to capture emerging inequalities in AI-mediated learning. It contributes a novel theoretical synthesis of affordance theory, disability studies and transformative learning, providing a framework for designing equitable, inclusive and agency-affirming educational practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/aiie-08-2025-0266
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hidden barriers of education and artificial intelligence: rethinking equity, affordances and ability

Daniel Autenrieth, Lea Schulz, Jan-René Schluchter
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Hidden barriers of education and artificial intelligence: rethinking equity, affordances and ability

Daniel Autenrieth, Lea Schulz, Jan-René Schluchter
article en

Abstract

Purpose This article investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes digital inequality in education by introducing the concepts of the AI divide and ability divide. It examines how exclusion emerges not only from unequal access or skills but from differential capacities to perceive, interpret and mobilize AI-mediated affordances. Design/methodology/approach The study is conceptual and theory-driven. It draws on transformative learning theory, critical disability studies and affordance theory to analyze how AI intersects with structural inequality, techno-ableist design and policy discourses of adaptability. Findings The analysis reveals that AI integration risks reinforcing normative expectations of capability and marginalizing learners who deviate from these standards. Denial to change introduced or mediated by AI is better understood as a socio-cultural response to disruption rather than a deficit. A co-evolutionary model of transformative education is proposed, positioning AI as a catalyst for rethinking purposes, norms and power relations in education. Originality/value The article advances the concept of the ability divide to capture emerging inequalities in AI-mediated learning. It contributes a novel theoretical synthesis of affordance theory, disability studies and transformative learning, providing a framework for designing equitable, inclusive and agency-affirming educational practices.

Artificial Intelligence in EducationVol. 2(5)
Europa-Universität Flensburg (DE), Ludwigsburg University of Education (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.