Be careful what you pay for: the effect of performance contingent incentives on online product reviews

Purpose This research investigates how performance-contingent incentivization schemes affect online review contributions. It explores the interplay between financial incentives, prosocial reinforcement (social versus reciprocal exchange) and reviewer experience. Design/methodology/approach The research conducts a field study in collaboration with a major North American online retailer to evaluate customer review behavior. Findings Reviewer experience moderates the effect of performance-contingent incentives on review decisions and length. First-time (vs experienced) reviewers see significant improvements in both review decisions and length with performance-contingent incentives. Additionally, because performance-contingent incentives reinforce reciprocal exchange, introducing reciprocal exchange reinforcement through messaging increases the level of effort but reduces review decisions. The optimal strategy depends on the platform's proportion of first-time reviewers and the retailer's specific review outcomes. Originality/value This work identifies reviewer experience and prosocial framing as critical boundary conditions for the effectiveness of performance-contingent incentives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-04-2026-0253
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Be careful what you pay for: the effect of performance contingent incentives on online product reviews

Renaud Legoux, Davood Wadi, Sylvain Sénécal, Marc Frédette
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

Be careful what you pay for: the effect of performance contingent incentives on online product reviews

Renaud Legoux, Davood Wadi, Sylvain Sénécal, Marc Frédette
article en

Abstract

Purpose This research investigates how performance-contingent incentivization schemes affect online review contributions. It explores the interplay between financial incentives, prosocial reinforcement (social versus reciprocal exchange) and reviewer experience. Design/methodology/approach The research conducts a field study in collaboration with a major North American online retailer to evaluate customer review behavior. Findings Reviewer experience moderates the effect of performance-contingent incentives on review decisions and length. First-time (vs experienced) reviewers see significant improvements in both review decisions and length with performance-contingent incentives. Additionally, because performance-contingent incentives reinforce reciprocal exchange, introducing reciprocal exchange reinforcement through messaging increases the level of effort but reduces review decisions. The optimal strategy depends on the platform's proportion of first-time reviewers and the retailer's specific review outcomes. Originality/value This work identifies reviewer experience and prosocial framing as critical boundary conditions for the effectiveness of performance-contingent incentives.

Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
HEC Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.