Atomic Cross-L2 Transactions: Coordination Theory and Interlock Protocol

As Layer 2 rollups proliferate to address Ethereum's scaling challenges, enabling atomic transactions across independent rollups has become critical for cross-chain composability. This work extends the Interlock protocol, which coordinates atomic cross-rollup transactions through a stateless shared sequencer. Interlock resolves atomic transactions sequentially during execution via lightweight messaging, while optimistically processing non-dependent transactions in parallel. This approach avoids computational overhead at the sequencer layer and eliminates the need for transaction pre-computation or state simulation. We provide correctness proofs and convergence stability analysis, establishing the conditions under which coordinated resolution outperforms blind optimistic execution. We compare three coordination architectures and analyze their trade-offs in sequencer complexity, execution layer requirements, and coordination overhead. Interlock is compatible with parallel execution models, ensuring atomicity while allowing continuous optimistic processing of transactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3845809
Primary Topic
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Atomic Cross-L2 Transactions: Coordination Theory and Interlock Protocol

Uri Lee, William J. Knottenbelt
Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
article

Atomic Cross-L2 Transactions: Coordination Theory and Interlock Protocol

Uri Lee, William J. Knottenbelt
article en

Abstract

As Layer 2 rollups proliferate to address Ethereum's scaling challenges, enabling atomic transactions across independent rollups has become critical for cross-chain composability. This work extends the Interlock protocol, which coordinates atomic cross-rollup transactions through a stateless shared sequencer. Interlock resolves atomic transactions sequentially during execution via lightweight messaging, while optimistically processing non-dependent transactions in parallel. This approach avoids computational overhead at the sequencer layer and eliminates the need for transaction pre-computation or state simulation. We provide correctness proofs and convergence stability analysis, establishing the conditions under which coordinated resolution outperforms blind optimistic execution. We compare three coordination architectures and analyze their trade-offs in sequencer complexity, execution layer requirements, and coordination overhead. Interlock is compatible with parallel execution models, ensuring atomicity while allowing continuous optimistic processing of transactions.

Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice
Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Atomic Cross-L2 Transactions: Coordination Theory and Interlock Protocol — Uri Lee, William J. Knottenbelt · Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS