Development and validation of a rapid 15-minute gastric ultrasound protocol for suspected gastroparesis: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

Background Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is the reference standard for gastroparesis but is limited by time, cost, and accessibility. We aimed to validate a practical 15-minute gastric ultrasonography (GUS) threshold for early assessment of suspected gastroparesis.Materials and methods We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study comparing GUS with GES. Participants were divided into training and validation cohorts by enrollment date. Using 4-hour GES as reference, the optimal GUS cut-off was derived by ROC analysis in the training cohort and tested in the validation cohort. Reproducibility and associations with symptom severity were assessed.Results Of 123 participants screened, 113 completed both GUS and GES (training, n = 67; validation, n = 46). GUS15min correlated with GES-derived emptying rates (GES120min: r = 0.51; GES240min: r = 0.50; both p < 0.0001). The optimal training cut-off was 0.195 (AUC 0.91, 95%CI 0.81-1.00). In validation, a threshold of 0.200 yielded an AUC of 0.90 (95%CI 0.80-0.99), sensitivity of 93.2%, and specificity of 88.3%, with substantial agreement with GES240min (κ = 0.758). Reproducibility was excellent (ICC = 0.976; κ = 0.904). GUS had a higher completion rate than GES (99.2% vs. 93.4%, p = 0.039). GUS15min was more strongly associated with total GCSI score than GES240min (r = −0.52 vs. −0.29; p = 0.0001).Conclusions A GUS15min threshold < 20.0% showed good validation performance, excellent reproducibility, and higher completion than GES. GUS may provide a useful bedside screening approach for suspected gastroparesis and help identify patients who should proceed to GES.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Medicine
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2718626
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a rapid 15-minute gastric ultrasound protocol for suspected gastroparesis: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

Faming Zhang, Zheyu Wang, Mengxi Ma, Xiaoshuang Xu et al.
Annals of Medicine
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Development and validation of a rapid 15-minute gastric ultrasound protocol for suspected gastroparesis: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

Faming Zhang, Zheyu Wang, Mengxi Ma, Xiaoshuang Xu, Xiaofei Xu, Kangtai Lv, Juan Wang, Quan Wen, Xia Wu, Bota Cui
article en

Abstract

Background Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is the reference standard for gastroparesis but is limited by time, cost, and accessibility. We aimed to validate a practical 15-minute gastric ultrasonography (GUS) threshold for early assessment of suspected gastroparesis.Materials and methods We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study comparing GUS with GES. Participants were divided into training and validation cohorts by enrollment date. Using 4-hour GES as reference, the optimal GUS cut-off was derived by ROC analysis in the training cohort and tested in the validation cohort. Reproducibility and associations with symptom severity were assessed.Results Of 123 participants screened, 113 completed both GUS and GES (training, n = 67; validation, n = 46). GUS15min correlated with GES-derived emptying rates (GES120min: r = 0.51; GES240min: r = 0.50; both p < 0.0001). The optimal training cut-off was 0.195 (AUC 0.91, 95%CI 0.81-1.00). In validation, a threshold of 0.200 yielded an AUC of 0.90 (95%CI 0.80-0.99), sensitivity of 93.2%, and specificity of 88.3%, with substantial agreement with GES240min (κ = 0.758). Reproducibility was excellent (ICC = 0.976; κ = 0.904). GUS had a higher completion rate than GES (99.2% vs. 93.4%, p = 0.039). GUS15min was more strongly associated with total GCSI score than GES240min (r = −0.52 vs. −0.29; p = 0.0001).Conclusions A GUS15min threshold < 20.0% showed good validation performance, excellent reproducibility, and higher completion than GES. GUS may provide a useful bedside screening approach for suspected gastroparesis and help identify patients who should proceed to GES.

Annals of MedicineVol. 58(1)
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN)
National Science Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.