ADDIE-guided pelvic examination teaching intervention: a quasi-experimental three-cohort study in an undergraduate clerkship

Abstract Objectives To evaluate whether an Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE)-guided, iteratively refined pelvic examination curriculum improves directly observed procedural performance in clerkship students. Methods A single-center quasi-experimental study was conducted with three cohorts (total n=86) to compare training approaches. Cohort 1 received a conventional simulation package (n=20); cohort 2 received an enhanced package supplemented with micro-courses and flashcards (n=20); and cohort 3 received a comprehensive package that additionally incorporated scenario simulation (n=46). The primary outcome was assessed using a 12-item formative checklist, scored from 0 to 100. Between-cohort differences were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and the effect size was reported as epsilon-squared ( ε 2 ). To account for potential confounding, an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model was fitted, with adjustment for gender, age, and baseline self-rated skill; heteroskedasticity-consistent (HC3) robust standard errors (SEs) were used, and two-sided Wald tests were applied for inference. Results Significant differences in total scores were found across cohorts ( H =49.76, p<0.001; ε 2 =0.575), with scores observed to increase progressively from cohort 1 (59.05 ± 14.78) to cohort 2 (92.80 ± 6.35) and cohort 3 (96.76 ± 3.37). After adjustment for covariates, both enhanced training approaches were found to be associated with substantially higher scores relative to conventional training (cohort 2 vs. cohort 1: β =35.03, 95 % confidence interval [ CI ]: 27.54–42.51, p<0.001; cohort 3 vs. cohort 1: β =38.92, 95 % CI : 31.75–46.08, p<0.001). Female gender was independently associated with higher scores ( β =5.47, 95 % CI : 1.98–8.95; p=0.002). Progressive improvement in self-rated skill was also observed across cohorts, with mean increases of 2.35, 2.80, and 3.17 points recorded, respectively. Conclusions ADDIE-guided iterative optimization was associated with large gains in observed pelvic examination performance. The largest increment followed integration of micro-courses and flashcards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Medical Education
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/gme-2026-0006
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ADDIE-guided pelvic examination teaching intervention: a quasi-experimental three-cohort study in an undergraduate clerkship

Yun Liu, Hungling Kwok, Menghan Peng, Tian Li et al.
Global Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

ADDIE-guided pelvic examination teaching intervention: a quasi-experimental three-cohort study in an undergraduate clerkship

Yun Liu, Hungling Kwok, Menghan Peng, Tian Li, Hui Fei, Mengxiong Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To evaluate whether an Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE)-guided, iteratively refined pelvic examination curriculum improves directly observed procedural performance in clerkship students. Methods A single-center quasi-experimental study was conducted with three cohorts (total n=86) to compare training approaches. Cohort 1 received a conventional simulation package (n=20); cohort 2 received an enhanced package supplemented with micro-courses and flashcards (n=20); and cohort 3 received a comprehensive package that additionally incorporated scenario simulation (n=46). The primary outcome was assessed using a 12-item formative checklist, scored from 0 to 100. Between-cohort differences were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and the effect size was reported as epsilon-squared ( ε 2 ). To account for potential confounding, an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model was fitted, with adjustment for gender, age, and baseline self-rated skill; heteroskedasticity-consistent (HC3) robust standard errors (SEs) were used, and two-sided Wald tests were applied for inference. Results Significant differences in total scores were found across cohorts ( H =49.76, p<0.001; ε 2 =0.575), with scores observed to increase progressively from cohort 1 (59.05 ± 14.78) to cohort 2 (92.80 ± 6.35) and cohort 3 (96.76 ± 3.37). After adjustment for covariates, both enhanced training approaches were found to be associated with substantially higher scores relative to conventional training (cohort 2 vs. cohort 1: β =35.03, 95 % confidence interval [ CI ]: 27.54–42.51, p<0.001; cohort 3 vs. cohort 1: β =38.92, 95 % CI : 31.75–46.08, p<0.001). Female gender was independently associated with higher scores ( β =5.47, 95 % CI : 1.98–8.95; p=0.002). Progressive improvement in self-rated skill was also observed across cohorts, with mean increases of 2.35, 2.80, and 3.17 points recorded, respectively. Conclusions ADDIE-guided iterative optimization was associated with large gains in observed pelvic examination performance. The largest increment followed integration of micro-courses and flashcards.

Global Medical Education
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.