Within-person reliability of composite scores or single-item responses with missing intensive longitudinal data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Methods
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000865
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Within-person reliability of composite scores or single-item responses with missing intensive longitudinal data.

Daniel McNeish
Psychological Methods
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Within-person reliability of composite scores or single-item responses with missing intensive longitudinal data.

Daniel McNeish
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological Methods
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Within-person reliability of composite scores or single-item responses with missing intensive longitudinal data. — Daniel McNeish · Psychological Methods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS