Periodic performance feedback and cognitive ability interactively mitigate the vigilance decrement
We investigated the effects of periodic performance feedback across three experiments. In Experiment 1, participants were assigned to either a feedback condition, in which there was periodic performance feedback (n = 302), or to a control condition, which received no feedback (n = 293). Whereas the control condition demonstrated a large vigilance decrement, even over a brief task duration, participants in the feedback condition performed both better overall and demonstrated a significantly shallower decrement. Experiment 2 (n = 103) was a preregistered replication with an extended task duration, and we directly replicated the findings. Experiment 3 was another preregistered experiment (n = 283), in which we examined three conditions with the extended duration: feedback for the entire task, feedback for only the first half of the task, and no feedback for the entire duration. The conditions did not differ in performance. However, in a post hoc cross-experimental analysis, we discovered significant moderation of the feedback effect via fluid intelligence. The findings have implications for how we view vigilance as a cognitive construct, why it typically wanes with time, and how it may be stabilized. All data and materials are publicly available on the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/fzd2h/ ).
Authors
- Matthew K. Robison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-6002)
- Benjamin Rudd
- Reyes Flores
Institutions
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Attention Perception & Psychophysics
- Published
- 2026-08-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-026-03314-8
- Primary Topic
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Office of Naval Research
- U.S. Naval Research Laboratory
- Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences