Old Theories, New Teams: Advancing Team Adaptation Theory for Human-Autonomy-Teams

Human–Autonomy Teams (HATs), composed of humans and agents such as artificial intelligence, face distinctive challenges in dynamic environments. As a result, they often struggle to adapt effectively, limiting their potential. Traditional team theories do not fully capture the unique characteristics of HATs, and research remains fragmented across disciplines, offering limited theoretical and practical guidance. Consequently, we propose a holistic framework that integrates the dynamic interplay between team members, tasks, and the environment. Drawing on multidisciplinary insights, we identify four key conditions—predictability, observability, plannability, and directability—that govern how HATs respond to shifting interdependencies. For each condition, we advance testable propositions, illustrate their relevance through established HAT testbeds, and outline technical, organizational, and interactional strategies to foster their emergence. Finally, we discuss how the framework provides a conceptual foundation to guide future research, training, and the design of adaptive HATs, by reflecting on its broader theoretical and practical implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Psychology Review
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866261478644
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Old Theories, New Teams: Advancing Team Adaptation Theory for Human-Autonomy-Teams

Anna‐Sophie Ulfert, Josette Gevers, Tilman Nols
Organizational Psychology Review
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Old Theories, New Teams: Advancing Team Adaptation Theory for Human-Autonomy-Teams

Anna‐Sophie Ulfert, Josette Gevers, Tilman Nols
article en

Abstract

Human–Autonomy Teams (HATs), composed of humans and agents such as artificial intelligence, face distinctive challenges in dynamic environments. As a result, they often struggle to adapt effectively, limiting their potential. Traditional team theories do not fully capture the unique characteristics of HATs, and research remains fragmented across disciplines, offering limited theoretical and practical guidance. Consequently, we propose a holistic framework that integrates the dynamic interplay between team members, tasks, and the environment. Drawing on multidisciplinary insights, we identify four key conditions—predictability, observability, plannability, and directability—that govern how HATs respond to shifting interdependencies. For each condition, we advance testable propositions, illustrate their relevance through established HAT testbeds, and outline technical, organizational, and interactional strategies to foster their emergence. Finally, we discuss how the framework provides a conceptual foundation to guide future research, training, and the design of adaptive HATs, by reflecting on its broader theoretical and practical implications.

Organizational Psychology Review
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Old Theories, New Teams: Advancing Team Adaptation Theory for Human-Autonomy-Teams — Anna‐Sophie Ulfert, Josette Gevers, et al. · Organizational Psychology Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS