Is the Far-Right Anti-Science? Hierarchies, Metapolitics and Struggles for Epistemic Authority

The right-wing actors are widely described as being anti-science. However, while the far-right often rejects science outright when it conflicts with their ideological, economic, or cultural priorities (e.g. anti-vax, climate change denial, creationism in schools), it also embraces science when it aligns with its worldview or political agenda, (e.g. nuclear power, space exploration, military technology). In between is the messier space in which the far right engage with and appropriate science to justify sexist, ethnonationalist, or exclusionary beliefs (e.g. genetics, IQ studies, evolutionary psychology). This paper examines such cases, exploring how the far-right engages in an epistemic struggle to lay claim to the ‘science’ of race and gender, simultaneously attacking and co-opting scientific authority to legitimise white supremacy and patriarchy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Epistemology
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2026.2697190
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the Far-Right Anti-Science? Hierarchies, Metapolitics and Struggles for Epistemic Authority

Catherine R. Baker
Social Epistemology
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
article

Is the Far-Right Anti-Science? Hierarchies, Metapolitics and Struggles for Epistemic Authority

Catherine R. Baker
article en

Abstract

The right-wing actors are widely described as being anti-science. However, while the far-right often rejects science outright when it conflicts with their ideological, economic, or cultural priorities (e.g. anti-vax, climate change denial, creationism in schools), it also embraces science when it aligns with its worldview or political agenda, (e.g. nuclear power, space exploration, military technology). In between is the messier space in which the far right engage with and appropriate science to justify sexist, ethnonationalist, or exclusionary beliefs (e.g. genetics, IQ studies, evolutionary psychology). This paper examines such cases, exploring how the far-right engages in an epistemic struggle to lay claim to the ‘science’ of race and gender, simultaneously attacking and co-opting scientific authority to legitimise white supremacy and patriarchy.

Social Epistemology
Dublin City University (IE)
Research Ireland
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is the Far-Right Anti-Science? Hierarchies, Metapolitics and Struggles for Epistemic Authority — Catherine R. Baker · Social Epistemology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS