The Effect of Alpha Neurofeedback Training with Auditory Feedback on Cognitive Control in Healthy Young Adults: How the Neurological Effects Vary by Stroop Task Difficulty

Background: Cognitive control is the ability to adapt to varying cognitive demands. Alpha neurofeedback (α-NFB) training is reported to affect neural activity, but little is known about whether neurophysiological responses to auditory α-NFB differ across cognitive tasks with different cognitive load. This exploratory pilot study examined the neurophysiological effects of a single session of auditory α-NFB during cognitive tasks with different cognitive loads. Method: Fifteen healthy young adults participated in the study. Participants completed Tasks 1 and 3 of the New Stroop Test I before and after the intervention. Neural oscillations and task-performance measures were assessed before and after the intervention. Pre–post changes were compared between the intervention and control groups. Results: For Task 1, the intervention group exhibited a significantly greater pre–post intervention change in the α/β ratio than the control group. However, the increase in alpha oscillatory power did not remain statistically significant after Holm correction for multiple comparisons. For Task 3, no significant between-group differences were observed in any neurophysiological or behavioral measure. Conclusions: These exploratory findings suggest that auditory αNFB may influence neurophysiological responses during Task 1, whereas no significant neurophysiological effects were observed during Task 3. This pattern is consistent with the possibility that neurophysiological responses to auditory αNFB may differ according to cognitive load; however, this interpretation remains preliminary and requires confirmation in larger studies. However, no corresponding differences in task performance were observed, and the findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16080886
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Alpha Neurofeedback Training with Auditory Feedback on Cognitive Control in Healthy Young Adults: How the Neurological Effects Vary by Stroop Task Difficulty

Wataru Inoue, Takayuki Kodama, Kyoka Matsui, Kazuma Mikata et al.
Brain Sciences
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

The Effect of Alpha Neurofeedback Training with Auditory Feedback on Cognitive Control in Healthy Young Adults: How the Neurological Effects Vary by Stroop Task Difficulty

Wataru Inoue, Takayuki Kodama, Kyoka Matsui, Kazuma Mikata, Nana Matsuo, Nagomi Okumura
article en

Abstract

Background: Cognitive control is the ability to adapt to varying cognitive demands. Alpha neurofeedback (α-NFB) training is reported to affect neural activity, but little is known about whether neurophysiological responses to auditory α-NFB differ across cognitive tasks with different cognitive load. This exploratory pilot study examined the neurophysiological effects of a single session of auditory α-NFB during cognitive tasks with different cognitive loads. Method: Fifteen healthy young adults participated in the study. Participants completed Tasks 1 and 3 of the New Stroop Test I before and after the intervention. Neural oscillations and task-performance measures were assessed before and after the intervention. Pre–post changes were compared between the intervention and control groups. Results: For Task 1, the intervention group exhibited a significantly greater pre–post intervention change in the α/β ratio than the control group. However, the increase in alpha oscillatory power did not remain statistically significant after Holm correction for multiple comparisons. For Task 3, no significant between-group differences were observed in any neurophysiological or behavioral measure. Conclusions: These exploratory findings suggest that auditory αNFB may influence neurophysiological responses during Task 1, whereas no significant neurophysiological effects were observed during Task 3. This pattern is consistent with the possibility that neurophysiological responses to auditory αNFB may differ according to cognitive load; however, this interpretation remains preliminary and requires confirmation in larger studies. However, no corresponding differences in task performance were observed, and the findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(8)
Kyoto City Hospital (JP), Hyogo Social Welfare Corporation (JP), University Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP), Izumi City General Hospital (JP), Kyoto Tachibana University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.