Machine learning meets configurational analysis: unveiling multiple pathways to energy-saving innovation in construction firms

Purpose This study aims to systematically identify the key influencing factors and formation paths of energy-saving technology innovation, providing theoretical guidance and practical insights for construction enterprises to promote green innovation. Design/methodology/approach Based on the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework, this study employs data from China's construction industry spanning 2017–2024. A mixed-method research design integrating machine learning (Random Forest), dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and necessary condition analysis (NCA) is adopted to systematically explore the driving mechanisms of energy-saving technology innovation. Findings Random Forest analysis identifies investment in innovation resources, technical talent intensity, organizational slack, executives' IT background, government environmental subsidies and environmental regulation as core influencing factors. Necessity analysis reveals no single necessary condition, though investment in innovation resources, technical talent intensity and environmental regulation emerge as the earliest bottleneck constraints. Sufficiency analysis uncovers four equifinal paths: capability-driven and resource orchestration configurations (H1a and H1b) and institutionally-induced agile orchestration configurations (H2a and H2b), while also identifying governance misalignment configurations associated with inferior outcomes (L1a and L1b). Dynamic analysis shows that the overall consistency of all configurations remains stable over time, whereas their firm-level coverage varies substantially across firms. Research limitations/implications The study focuses on China's construction industry; future research could extend to other industries and national contexts. Practical implications Energy-saving technology innovation requires synergistic resonance of multidimensional factors. Enterprises should select differentiated innovation paths based on their resource endowments, while governments need to improve institutional environments to stimulate innovation vitality. Originality/value This study innovatively integrates machine learning with configurational analysis methods, revealing the causal complexity and asymmetry of energy-saving technology innovation and providing new perspectives for applying the TOE framework in the green innovation domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-09-2025-1548
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning meets configurational analysis: unveiling multiple pathways to energy-saving innovation in construction firms

Han Yan, Shenglin Ma, Ding Li, Abdullahi D. Ahmed
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Machine learning meets configurational analysis: unveiling multiple pathways to energy-saving innovation in construction firms

Han Yan, Shenglin Ma, Ding Li, Abdullahi D. Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to systematically identify the key influencing factors and formation paths of energy-saving technology innovation, providing theoretical guidance and practical insights for construction enterprises to promote green innovation. Design/methodology/approach Based on the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework, this study employs data from China's construction industry spanning 2017–2024. A mixed-method research design integrating machine learning (Random Forest), dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and necessary condition analysis (NCA) is adopted to systematically explore the driving mechanisms of energy-saving technology innovation. Findings Random Forest analysis identifies investment in innovation resources, technical talent intensity, organizational slack, executives' IT background, government environmental subsidies and environmental regulation as core influencing factors. Necessity analysis reveals no single necessary condition, though investment in innovation resources, technical talent intensity and environmental regulation emerge as the earliest bottleneck constraints. Sufficiency analysis uncovers four equifinal paths: capability-driven and resource orchestration configurations (H1a and H1b) and institutionally-induced agile orchestration configurations (H2a and H2b), while also identifying governance misalignment configurations associated with inferior outcomes (L1a and L1b). Dynamic analysis shows that the overall consistency of all configurations remains stable over time, whereas their firm-level coverage varies substantially across firms. Research limitations/implications The study focuses on China's construction industry; future research could extend to other industries and national contexts. Practical implications Energy-saving technology innovation requires synergistic resonance of multidimensional factors. Enterprises should select differentiated innovation paths based on their resource endowments, while governments need to improve institutional environments to stimulate innovation vitality. Originality/value This study innovatively integrates machine learning with configurational analysis methods, revealing the causal complexity and asymmetry of energy-saving technology innovation and providing new perspectives for applying the TOE framework in the green innovation domain.

Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
North University of China (CN), Tianjin University of Finance and Economics (CN), Nankai University (CN), MIT University (MK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.