Generational warfare online? Social media use and intergroup attitudes in a national survey

Content analyses document vitriolic generational discourse across social media platforms, yet surveys reveal moderate attitudes among the public. Does social media exposure create extreme generational attitudes? Using nationally representative survey data (n=1,221), this study examines whether total social media use and platform-specific usage patterns correlate with generational self-identification and intergroup attitudes among American adults. Results reveal limited associations with even frequent users not exhibiting greater generational antagonism. Platform-specific analyses reveal few significant effects, though YouTube use is associated with more favorable attitudes toward other generations. These largely null findings suggest extreme online discourse does not reflect typical users’ attitudes, implying that reasons for extreme discourse are connected to visibility mechanisms, such as algorithmic amplification and creators’ strategic performance. The study also demonstrates the risks of inferring population attitudes from content analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Communication & Society
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2026.2717383
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generational warfare online? Social media use and intergroup attitudes in a national survey

Andrew M. Lindner, Elena O'Connell
Information Communication & Society
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Generational warfare online? Social media use and intergroup attitudes in a national survey

Andrew M. Lindner, Elena O'Connell
article en

Abstract

Content analyses document vitriolic generational discourse across social media platforms, yet surveys reveal moderate attitudes among the public. Does social media exposure create extreme generational attitudes? Using nationally representative survey data (n=1,221), this study examines whether total social media use and platform-specific usage patterns correlate with generational self-identification and intergroup attitudes among American adults. Results reveal limited associations with even frequent users not exhibiting greater generational antagonism. Platform-specific analyses reveal few significant effects, though YouTube use is associated with more favorable attitudes toward other generations. These largely null findings suggest extreme online discourse does not reflect typical users’ attitudes, implying that reasons for extreme discourse are connected to visibility mechanisms, such as algorithmic amplification and creators’ strategic performance. The study also demonstrates the risks of inferring population attitudes from content analysis.

Information Communication & Society
Skidmore College (US)
Skidmore College
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generational warfare online? Social media use and intergroup attitudes in a national survey — Andrew M. Lindner, Elena O'Connell · Information Communication & Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS