Pfizer Versus Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Mortality: Evidence from Linked Mortality and Vaccination Records in Indiana

Objective: It is commonly believed in the public health community that the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were broadly similar in preventing COVID-19 mortality, with perhaps a small advantage for Moderna. We revisit this question, using a research design that controls for healthy-vaccinee bias. Methods: We studied deaths among persons aged 15 years or greater from January 2021 through December 2022 in Indiana, linked to vaccination records, using an outcome measure, namely COVID-19 Excess Mortality Percentage (CEMP), which uses non-COVID natural mortality to control for HVB. Results: We find both large healthy-vaccinee bias for both vaccines, and larger bias for Pfizervaccinees: Pfizer recipients were healthier and thus would have faced lower COVID-19 mortality without vaccination. For ages 60+, we find almost 50% higher COVID-19 remaining mortality risk (RMR) for Pfizer vaccinees receiving primary vaccination over a “core period” from 2Q2021 through 1Q2022: the average Pfizer/Moderna RMR ratio was 1.49. For ages 15–59, this ratio was 1.25, but was not statistically significant. For booster dose for ages 60+, the average Pfizer/Moderna RMR ratio was 1.34. For 2Q2022 through 4Q2022, after the major Omicron wave, we find much lower vaccine effectiveness and no significant Pfizer–Moderna difference. Conclusions: During the period with both good vaccine availability and high COVID-19 mortality (2Q-2021–1Q2022), the Moderna vaccine was associated with lower COVID-19 mortality, relative to the Pfizer vaccine. A possible explanation is the higher Moderna dose (100 μg vs. 30 for Pfizer). After that period, a high percentage of the population had natural immunity from prior COVID-19 infection; we find only small mortality gains from vaccination, with no significant Pfizer–Moderna difference. Policy Implications: Controlling for healthy-vaccinee bias, Moderna was associated with lower COVID-19 mortality, relative to Pfizer. This difference was not known in real-time due to the failure of the available studies to address healthy-vaccinee bias. Controlling for such bias is vital when making vaccination policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14080717
Primary Topic
Immune responses and vaccinations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pfizer Versus Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Mortality: Evidence from Linked Mortality and Vaccination Records in Indiana

JEFF WHITTLE, Vladimir A. Atanasov, Andy Ye Yuan, Ali Moghtaderi et al.
Vaccines
Immune responses and vaccinations
article

Pfizer Versus Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Mortality: Evidence from Linked Mortality and Vaccination Records in Indiana

JEFF WHITTLE, Vladimir A. Atanasov, Andy Ye Yuan, Ali Moghtaderi, Benjamin W. Weston, Kevin McGurk, Bernard S. Black, Sadia Farzana, Francesco Maria Rossi, Qian Eric Luo
article en

Abstract

Objective: It is commonly believed in the public health community that the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were broadly similar in preventing COVID-19 mortality, with perhaps a small advantage for Moderna. We revisit this question, using a research design that controls for healthy-vaccinee bias. Methods: We studied deaths among persons aged 15 years or greater from January 2021 through December 2022 in Indiana, linked to vaccination records, using an outcome measure, namely COVID-19 Excess Mortality Percentage (CEMP), which uses non-COVID natural mortality to control for HVB. Results: We find both large healthy-vaccinee bias for both vaccines, and larger bias for Pfizervaccinees: Pfizer recipients were healthier and thus would have faced lower COVID-19 mortality without vaccination. For ages 60+, we find almost 50% higher COVID-19 remaining mortality risk (RMR) for Pfizer vaccinees receiving primary vaccination over a “core period” from 2Q2021 through 1Q2022: the average Pfizer/Moderna RMR ratio was 1.49. For ages 15–59, this ratio was 1.25, but was not statistically significant. For booster dose for ages 60+, the average Pfizer/Moderna RMR ratio was 1.34. For 2Q2022 through 4Q2022, after the major Omicron wave, we find much lower vaccine effectiveness and no significant Pfizer–Moderna difference. Conclusions: During the period with both good vaccine availability and high COVID-19 mortality (2Q-2021–1Q2022), the Moderna vaccine was associated with lower COVID-19 mortality, relative to the Pfizer vaccine. A possible explanation is the higher Moderna dose (100 μg vs. 30 for Pfizer). After that period, a high percentage of the population had natural immunity from prior COVID-19 infection; we find only small mortality gains from vaccination, with no significant Pfizer–Moderna difference. Policy Implications: Controlling for healthy-vaccinee bias, Moderna was associated with lower COVID-19 mortality, relative to Pfizer. This difference was not known in real-time due to the failure of the available studies to address healthy-vaccinee bias. Controlling for such bias is vital when making vaccination policy.

VaccinesVol. 14(8)
Northwestern University (US), Milken Institute (US), William & Mary (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), University of Florida (US), Florida College (US)
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Immune responses and vaccinations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.