Equity in Community Forestry in the United States

In the United States as elsewhere, community forestry is growing as a form of forest management and governance. Community forests bring decision-making and benefits closer to the community, yet not everyone in a community has the same access to either. We examine how community forest governing bodies address equity in decision-making about, and benefits from, community forest management. Using a case-study approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders associated with two community forests in the U.S. Inter-mountain West. The cases took different approaches to enhancing participation in decision-making about forest management, one through formal processes and one through informal channels, with mixed success for advancing equity. The cases also took different approaches to benefit distribution, one being more proactive and deliberate with its efforts and the other more reactive and responsive to pressure from local residents. We discuss key lessons for how community forest formation and governance can be structured more equitably.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Society & Natural Resources
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2026.2717708
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity in Community Forestry in the United States

Susan Charnley, Lauren McCaskill, Reem Hajjar
Society & Natural Resources
Forest Management and Policy
article

Equity in Community Forestry in the United States

Susan Charnley, Lauren McCaskill, Reem Hajjar
article en

Abstract

In the United States as elsewhere, community forestry is growing as a form of forest management and governance. Community forests bring decision-making and benefits closer to the community, yet not everyone in a community has the same access to either. We examine how community forest governing bodies address equity in decision-making about, and benefits from, community forest management. Using a case-study approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders associated with two community forests in the U.S. Inter-mountain West. The cases took different approaches to enhancing participation in decision-making about forest management, one through formal processes and one through informal channels, with mixed success for advancing equity. The cases also took different approaches to benefit distribution, one being more proactive and deliberate with its efforts and the other more reactive and responsive to pressure from local residents. We discuss key lessons for how community forest formation and governance can be structured more equitably.

Society & Natural Resources
Oregon State University (US), Center for Global Development (US), Cornell University (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.