Distinguishing Organizing Pneumonia from Malignancy During Cancer Surveillance: Predominant Diagnostic Value of Imaging over Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers

Background: Distinguishing organizing pneumonia from recurrent malignancy in patients undergoing cancer surveillance remains a major clinical challenge. Although inflammatory biomarkers have emerged as potential diagnostic tools, their incremental value beyond imaging-based assessment remains uncertain. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated 170 patients with prior malignancy who underwent surgical assessment for suspicious lung-only pulmonary lesions between 2013 and 2023. Histopathology confirmed organizing pneumonia in 61 patients and malignancy in 109 patients. Preoperative clinical, radiologic, Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and inflammatory biomarker variables were incorporated into predefined clinical, radiology-PET/CT, biomarker, and integrated models using Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-penalized logistic regression with internal cross-validation. Results: The radiology/PET model demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC 0.927), closely approximating the performance of the integrated model (AUC 0.935). The clinical and biomarker-only models showed moderate discrimination (AUC 0.764 and 0.778, respectively). Adding inflammatory biomarkers to imaging-derived features resulted in only a minimal improvement in diagnostic performance (ΔAUC = 0.009, 95% CI −0.019 to 0.037), indicating no statistically significant incremental benefit. Calibration, decision curve, and predictor stability analyses consistently identified radiologic and PET/CT-derived variables as the principal sources of predictive information. Conclusions: In patients with suspicious pulmonary lesions during cancer surveillance, diagnostic discrimination was driven predominantly by imaging-derived features, whereas conventional inflammatory biomarkers provided limited incremental value. These findings support an imaging-centered approach to preoperative risk stratification and multidisciplinary decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33080491
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing Organizing Pneumonia from Malignancy During Cancer Surveillance: Predominant Diagnostic Value of Imaging over Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers

Asım Armağan Aydın, Hacer Boztepe Yeşilçay
Current Oncology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Distinguishing Organizing Pneumonia from Malignancy During Cancer Surveillance: Predominant Diagnostic Value of Imaging over Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers

Asım Armağan Aydın, Hacer Boztepe Yeşilçay
article en

Abstract

Background: Distinguishing organizing pneumonia from recurrent malignancy in patients undergoing cancer surveillance remains a major clinical challenge. Although inflammatory biomarkers have emerged as potential diagnostic tools, their incremental value beyond imaging-based assessment remains uncertain. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated 170 patients with prior malignancy who underwent surgical assessment for suspicious lung-only pulmonary lesions between 2013 and 2023. Histopathology confirmed organizing pneumonia in 61 patients and malignancy in 109 patients. Preoperative clinical, radiologic, Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and inflammatory biomarker variables were incorporated into predefined clinical, radiology-PET/CT, biomarker, and integrated models using Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-penalized logistic regression with internal cross-validation. Results: The radiology/PET model demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC 0.927), closely approximating the performance of the integrated model (AUC 0.935). The clinical and biomarker-only models showed moderate discrimination (AUC 0.764 and 0.778, respectively). Adding inflammatory biomarkers to imaging-derived features resulted in only a minimal improvement in diagnostic performance (ΔAUC = 0.009, 95% CI −0.019 to 0.037), indicating no statistically significant incremental benefit. Calibration, decision curve, and predictor stability analyses consistently identified radiologic and PET/CT-derived variables as the principal sources of predictive information. Conclusions: In patients with suspicious pulmonary lesions during cancer surveillance, diagnostic discrimination was driven predominantly by imaging-derived features, whereas conventional inflammatory biomarkers provided limited incremental value. These findings support an imaging-centered approach to preoperative risk stratification and multidisciplinary decision-making.

Current OncologyVol. 33(8)
Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.