Dialysis Modalities in Liver Cirrhosis with ESKD

BACKGROUND: In patients with liver cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease, the optimal dialysis modality remains uncertain because liver cirrhosis amplifies competing risks of infection, bleeding, and cardiovascular events. METHODS: Using the TriNetX electronic health record network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with liver cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease initiating peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis, matched 1:1 on 43 covariates. Follow-up began at a 30-day landmark. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included peritonitis, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis, and hospitalization. Composite major adverse cardiovascular events, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke were exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1,534 matched pairs, peritoneal dialysis was associated with lower 3-year survival (39.5% versus 46.6%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10 to 1.38; P < 0.001), higher risk of peritonitis (HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.86 to 5.19; P < 0.001) and sepsis (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.84; P < 0.001), and more hospital admissions (mean, 4.94 versus 4.32; P = 0.02). Gastrointestinal bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis did not differ significantly (HR, 1.20; P = 0.38). Among exploratory cardiovascular outcomes, peritoneal dialysis was associated with higher composite major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.72; P = 0.01) and borderline higher non-fatal myocardial infarction risk (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.69; P = 0.05), whereas non-fatal stroke did not differ significantly (HR, 1.32; P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with liver cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease, peritoneal dialysis was associated with higher mortality, greater infectious and hospitalization burden compared with hemodialysis, without a reduction in severe gastrointestinal bleeding; in exploratory analyses, peritoneal dialysis was also associated with higher composite major adverse cardiovascular events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kidney360
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34067/kid.0000001325
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialysis Modalities in Liver Cirrhosis with ESKD

Raymond K. Hsu, Yen‐Chung Lin, Ting‐Yu Lin, Wei‐Yu Kao et al.
Kidney360
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

Dialysis Modalities in Liver Cirrhosis with ESKD

Raymond K. Hsu, Yen‐Chung Lin, Ting‐Yu Lin, Wei‐Yu Kao, Hsing‐Jung Yeh, Ming‐Tsang Chuang, J.H. Chang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with liver cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease, the optimal dialysis modality remains uncertain because liver cirrhosis amplifies competing risks of infection, bleeding, and cardiovascular events. METHODS: Using the TriNetX electronic health record network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with liver cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease initiating peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis, matched 1:1 on 43 covariates. Follow-up began at a 30-day landmark. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included peritonitis, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis, and hospitalization. Composite major adverse cardiovascular events, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke were exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1,534 matched pairs, peritoneal dialysis was associated with lower 3-year survival (39.5% versus 46.6%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10 to 1.38; P < 0.001), higher risk of peritonitis (HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.86 to 5.19; P < 0.001) and sepsis (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.84; P < 0.001), and more hospital admissions (mean, 4.94 versus 4.32; P = 0.02). Gastrointestinal bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis did not differ significantly (HR, 1.20; P = 0.38). Among exploratory cardiovascular outcomes, peritoneal dialysis was associated with higher composite major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.72; P = 0.01) and borderline higher non-fatal myocardial infarction risk (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.69; P = 0.05), whereas non-fatal stroke did not differ significantly (HR, 1.32; P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with liver cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease, peritoneal dialysis was associated with higher mortality, greater infectious and hospitalization burden compared with hemodialysis, without a reduction in severe gastrointestinal bleeding; in exploratory analyses, peritoneal dialysis was also associated with higher composite major adverse cardiovascular events.

Kidney360
Fu Jen Catholic University (TW), University of California, San Francisco (US), Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW), Memorial Hospital (US), Taipei Medical University (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.