Antinomies of Nativism: Understanding Decoloniality Theory's Affinities with the Global Far Right

ABSTRACT This article examines the peculiar conjuncture of decolonial theory and contemporary far‐right ideology. It argues that their shared fixation on the dualism of native and settler is immanent to the development of advanced capitalism, particularly the sharpening of its contradictory tendency to undermine labour as the source of value, and to the crisis‐driven accumulation of fictitious capital over recent decades. Mahmood Mamdani's critique of the settler–native binary and Moishe Postone's critique of romantic anti‐capitalism together illuminate how such nativist ideology privileges the ‘concrete’ over the ‘abstract’ — use value over exchange value — thereby reproducing an ideology that remains blind to the concrete historical totality from which this dualism arises and that can only flourish in the absence of dialectical mediation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Development and Change
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.70082
Primary Topic
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antinomies of Nativism: Understanding Decoloniality Theory's Affinities with the Global Far Right

Neil Larsen, Aylin Bademsoy
Development and Change
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
article

Antinomies of Nativism: Understanding Decoloniality Theory's Affinities with the Global Far Right

Neil Larsen, Aylin Bademsoy
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines the peculiar conjuncture of decolonial theory and contemporary far‐right ideology. It argues that their shared fixation on the dualism of native and settler is immanent to the development of advanced capitalism, particularly the sharpening of its contradictory tendency to undermine labour as the source of value, and to the crisis‐driven accumulation of fictitious capital over recent decades. Mahmood Mamdani's critique of the settler–native binary and Moishe Postone's critique of romantic anti‐capitalism together illuminate how such nativist ideology privileges the ‘concrete’ over the ‘abstract’ — use value over exchange value — thereby reproducing an ideology that remains blind to the concrete historical totality from which this dualism arises and that can only flourish in the absence of dialectical mediation.

Development and Change
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.