Estimating running economy using wearable trunk accelerometry: a comparative analysis of three footwear conditions in highly trained runners

Wearable accelerometry offers a practical methodology for analysing running biomechanics, a key determinant of running economy (RE). This study investigated whether accelerometer-derived features could estimate RE in highly trained runners. Eighteen male participants (age: 26.5 ± 3.4 years; body mass index: 21.1 ± 1.2 kg/m2; 5 km personal best: 15 min 26 s ± 1 min) completed one laboratory visit, with RE assessed during 5-min treadmill runs at 12 km/h and 16 km/h across three shoe conditions. Metabolic parameters were quantified via indirect calorimetry, while a tri-axial accelerometer measured biomechanical features. A data-driven two-step variable-selection procedure was combined with a linear mixed model to estimate RE from accelerometer data. Estimation accuracy was assessed with mean absolute error (MAE) and Bland-Altman plots. A three-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare estimated and actual RE across speed and shoe conditions. At 12 km/h, six biomechanical variables explained 35.4% of RE variance, whereas at 16 km/h, two variables accounted for 35.1%. While estimated and actual RE did not significantly differ at either speed (p = 1.00), this does not demonstrate equivalence. Relative MAE was 3–4% and Bland-Altman plots showed wide relative limits of agreement (~9–10%), indicating limited individual-level accuracy. Accelerometry could estimate RE within this sample on a group-level, but its individual-level accuracy and sensitivity to footwear effects are limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports Biomechanics
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2026.2715652
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating running economy using wearable trunk accelerometry: a comparative analysis of three footwear conditions in highly trained runners

Toon T. de Beukelaar, Benedicte Vanwanseele, Davide Petrella, Yoram Müller-Jabusch
Sports Biomechanics
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Estimating running economy using wearable trunk accelerometry: a comparative analysis of three footwear conditions in highly trained runners

Toon T. de Beukelaar, Benedicte Vanwanseele, Davide Petrella, Yoram Müller-Jabusch
article en

Abstract

Wearable accelerometry offers a practical methodology for analysing running biomechanics, a key determinant of running economy (RE). This study investigated whether accelerometer-derived features could estimate RE in highly trained runners. Eighteen male participants (age: 26.5 ± 3.4 years; body mass index: 21.1 ± 1.2 kg/m2; 5 km personal best: 15 min 26 s ± 1 min) completed one laboratory visit, with RE assessed during 5-min treadmill runs at 12 km/h and 16 km/h across three shoe conditions. Metabolic parameters were quantified via indirect calorimetry, while a tri-axial accelerometer measured biomechanical features. A data-driven two-step variable-selection procedure was combined with a linear mixed model to estimate RE from accelerometer data. Estimation accuracy was assessed with mean absolute error (MAE) and Bland-Altman plots. A three-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare estimated and actual RE across speed and shoe conditions. At 12 km/h, six biomechanical variables explained 35.4% of RE variance, whereas at 16 km/h, two variables accounted for 35.1%. While estimated and actual RE did not significantly differ at either speed (p = 1.00), this does not demonstrate equivalence. Relative MAE was 3–4% and Bland-Altman plots showed wide relative limits of agreement (~9–10%), indicating limited individual-level accuracy. Accelerometry could estimate RE within this sample on a group-level, but its individual-level accuracy and sensitivity to footwear effects are limited.

Sports Biomechanics
KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.