A survey investigation of the imaging practices of human body donors in gross anatomy laboratories

The imaging of human body donors, as photographs and videos, is increasing in need as digital access of educational materials increases. In the past several years, several professional societies have published guidelines and recommendations for imaging human body donors for all who work with human body donors. However, the implementation of policies, the storage of images, and the compliance with these policies are largely unknown. The Human Anatomy and Physiology Society Anatomical Donor Stewardship Committee distributed a survey to determine the policies for imaging human body donors to institutions that use human body donors through professional anatomy organization listservs. A total of 74 (n = 74) responses were returned. The most common policy was to request permission before any imaging of human donors. Imaging policies were influenced by the amount of donors, where the donors were obtained (internal programs, external programs, or mixed), but not by the type of institution or the use of the donors (dissection, prosection, etc.). Of those who took images, photographs were more common over videos for both educational and research use. However, those who took videos for education mainly reported policies prohibiting imaging. When storing images, more restrictive imaging policies were more likely to report secure storage of digital donor materials. This study shows that each institution still has a variety of policies for imaging of human donors, and not all follow the published guidelines. Overall, the landscape of current policies demonstrates a strong need to standardize policies for imaging of donors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anatomical Sciences Education
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70339
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A survey investigation of the imaging practices of human body donors in gross anatomy laboratories

Rhiannon Robinson, Kelsey Stevens, Bobbie J. Leeper, Jeremy J. Grachan et al.
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

A survey investigation of the imaging practices of human body donors in gross anatomy laboratories

Rhiannon Robinson, Kelsey Stevens, Bobbie J. Leeper, Jeremy J. Grachan, Danielle N. Edwards
article en

Abstract

The imaging of human body donors, as photographs and videos, is increasing in need as digital access of educational materials increases. In the past several years, several professional societies have published guidelines and recommendations for imaging human body donors for all who work with human body donors. However, the implementation of policies, the storage of images, and the compliance with these policies are largely unknown. The Human Anatomy and Physiology Society Anatomical Donor Stewardship Committee distributed a survey to determine the policies for imaging human body donors to institutions that use human body donors through professional anatomy organization listservs. A total of 74 (n = 74) responses were returned. The most common policy was to request permission before any imaging of human donors. Imaging policies were influenced by the amount of donors, where the donors were obtained (internal programs, external programs, or mixed), but not by the type of institution or the use of the donors (dissection, prosection, etc.). Of those who took images, photographs were more common over videos for both educational and research use. However, those who took videos for education mainly reported policies prohibiting imaging. When storing images, more restrictive imaging policies were more likely to report secure storage of digital donor materials. This study shows that each institution still has a variety of policies for imaging of human donors, and not all follow the published guidelines. Overall, the landscape of current policies demonstrates a strong need to standardize policies for imaging of donors.

Anatomical Sciences Education
Briar Cliff University (US), Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Boston University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US), Seton Hill University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.