Sex Differences in Postoperative Recovery and Mortality After High‐Risk Cardiac Surgery: A Propensity Score–Matched Post Hoc Analysis of the SUSTAIN‐CSX Trial

Background Sex‐related differences after cardiac surgery remain controversial because women often present with higher baseline risk and complexity than men. We performed a post hoc propensity score–matched analysis of the SUSTAIN‐CSX (Sodium Selenite Administration in Cardiac Surgery) trial to evaluate sex differences in mortality, postoperative complications, and recovery after high‐risk cardiac surgery. Methods Of 1394 trial participants, 1386 had complete data. Women were matched 1:1 to men using nearest‐neighbor propensity score matching based on age and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II), with exact matching on surgical category, yielding 327 female–male pairs. Prespecified sensitivity analyses adjusted for frailty, baseline hemoglobin, renal disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, previous myocardial infarction, preoperative medications, and baseline creatinine. Results In the primary matched analysis, 180‐day survival did not differ between women and men (log‐rank P =0.086; unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.80 [95% CI, 0.91–3.55]; P =0.091). In descriptive matched comparisons, women had numerically longer intensive care unit stay (median, 3 days [quartile 1, quartile 3 (Q1, Q3)=1, 6 days] versus 2 days [Q1, Q3=1, 5 days]) and hospital stay (median, 10 days [Q1, Q3=7, 18 days] versus 9 days [Q1, Q3=6, 16 days]; P =0.292), whereas major postoperative complications were similar. In adjusted sensitivity analyses accounting for the matched design and residual imbalance, female sex remained associated with longer intensive care unit stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2–2.9]; P =0.009) and hospital stay (adjusted IRR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.0–1.9]; P =0.031). Mortality sensitivity analyses were model‐dependent. Conclusions In this propensity score–matched cohort of high‐risk cardiac surgery patients, women showed a longer postoperative recovery trajectory in adjusted analyses, whereas mortality findings were sensitive to model specification and should be interpreted cautiously. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02002247.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.126.049243
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Postoperative Recovery and Mortality After High‐Risk Cardiac Surgery: A Propensity Score–Matched Post Hoc Analysis of the SUSTAIN‐CSX Trial

Georg Daniel Duerr, Christian Stoppe, Ghaith Mohsen, Yusuf Shieba et al.
Journal of the American Heart Association
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Sex Differences in Postoperative Recovery and Mortality After High‐Risk Cardiac Surgery: A Propensity Score–Matched Post Hoc Analysis of the SUSTAIN‐CSX Trial

Georg Daniel Duerr, Christian Stoppe, Ghaith Mohsen, Yusuf Shieba, Rashad Zayat, Quirin Notz, Alish Kolashov, Ahmed F. A. Mohammed, Ajay Moza, Jan Beer, Daniel Catena
article en

Abstract

Background Sex‐related differences after cardiac surgery remain controversial because women often present with higher baseline risk and complexity than men. We performed a post hoc propensity score–matched analysis of the SUSTAIN‐CSX (Sodium Selenite Administration in Cardiac Surgery) trial to evaluate sex differences in mortality, postoperative complications, and recovery after high‐risk cardiac surgery. Methods Of 1394 trial participants, 1386 had complete data. Women were matched 1:1 to men using nearest‐neighbor propensity score matching based on age and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II), with exact matching on surgical category, yielding 327 female–male pairs. Prespecified sensitivity analyses adjusted for frailty, baseline hemoglobin, renal disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, previous myocardial infarction, preoperative medications, and baseline creatinine. Results In the primary matched analysis, 180‐day survival did not differ between women and men (log‐rank P =0.086; unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.80 [95% CI, 0.91–3.55]; P =0.091). In descriptive matched comparisons, women had numerically longer intensive care unit stay (median, 3 days [quartile 1, quartile 3 (Q1, Q3)=1, 6 days] versus 2 days [Q1, Q3=1, 5 days]) and hospital stay (median, 10 days [Q1, Q3=7, 18 days] versus 9 days [Q1, Q3=6, 16 days]; P =0.292), whereas major postoperative complications were similar. In adjusted sensitivity analyses accounting for the matched design and residual imbalance, female sex remained associated with longer intensive care unit stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2–2.9]; P =0.009) and hospital stay (adjusted IRR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.0–1.9]; P =0.031). Mortality sensitivity analyses were model‐dependent. Conclusions In this propensity score–matched cohort of high‐risk cardiac surgery patients, women showed a longer postoperative recovery trajectory in adjusted analyses, whereas mortality findings were sensitive to model specification and should be interpreted cautiously. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02002247.

Journal of the American Heart Association
South Valley University (EG), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Convent Hospital of the Brothers of Saint John of God (AT), Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder (DE), Utenos kolegija Higher Education Institution (LT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.