Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in Additives and Technologies for Low-Density Drilling Fluids

Abstract This review investigates the evolution of additives and technologies developed for density reduction in drilling fluids and discusses their applicability and main trade-offs. The authors present the main advantages, limitations, and economic and environmental implications of each additive class and discuss their influence on fluid stability, rheology, and operational safety. A literature search was carried out in the ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, using the following keywords: “low-density drilling fluid additives,” “lightweight drilling fluid additives,” “density reduction drilling fluid additives,” and “underbalanced drilling fluid additives,” covering experimental and review papers published between 2015 and 2026. A second search was performed using the same keywords, substituting “drilling fluid” with “drilling mud” to broaden the scope of the search. Most of the studies were experimental and focused on water-based systems, identifying hollow glass spheres as the most investigated and widely adopted additive for density reduction. Emerging materials such as polymeric and biobased additives also show promising potential for sustainable and low-cost formulations. Oil-based systems remain underrepresented in the literature despite the lower density of oil as a base fluid compared to water and the rise of environmentally friendly base oils. By clarifying technological trade-offs, identifying knowledge gaps, and outlining concrete innovation pathways, this review consolidates fragmented literature into a unified review specifically focused on density-reducing additives. In addition, by evaluating the technical, economic, and environmental factors involved, it supports the advancement of next-generation lightweight drilling fluids. Overall, the findings indicate that research on density-reducing additives is still limited, revealing a clear need for further studies and field-scale validation to support the development of the next generation of ultralightweight and sustainable drilling fluids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6c04580
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in Additives and Technologies for Low-Density Drilling Fluids

Marina Seixas Pereira, Cláudio R. Duarte, Raphael Dannemann-Pires
ACS Omega
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in Additives and Technologies for Low-Density Drilling Fluids

Marina Seixas Pereira, Cláudio R. Duarte, Raphael Dannemann-Pires
article en

Abstract

Abstract This review investigates the evolution of additives and technologies developed for density reduction in drilling fluids and discusses their applicability and main trade-offs. The authors present the main advantages, limitations, and economic and environmental implications of each additive class and discuss their influence on fluid stability, rheology, and operational safety. A literature search was carried out in the ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, using the following keywords: “low-density drilling fluid additives,” “lightweight drilling fluid additives,” “density reduction drilling fluid additives,” and “underbalanced drilling fluid additives,” covering experimental and review papers published between 2015 and 2026. A second search was performed using the same keywords, substituting “drilling fluid” with “drilling mud” to broaden the scope of the search. Most of the studies were experimental and focused on water-based systems, identifying hollow glass spheres as the most investigated and widely adopted additive for density reduction. Emerging materials such as polymeric and biobased additives also show promising potential for sustainable and low-cost formulations. Oil-based systems remain underrepresented in the literature despite the lower density of oil as a base fluid compared to water and the rise of environmentally friendly base oils. By clarifying technological trade-offs, identifying knowledge gaps, and outlining concrete innovation pathways, this review consolidates fragmented literature into a unified review specifically focused on density-reducing additives. In addition, by evaluating the technical, economic, and environmental factors involved, it supports the advancement of next-generation lightweight drilling fluids. Overall, the findings indicate that research on density-reducing additives is still limited, revealing a clear need for further studies and field-scale validation to support the development of the next generation of ultralightweight and sustainable drilling fluids.

ACS Omega
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Petrobras, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.