Public Comments and Federal Rulemaking for Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars

Importance: In May 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested public comment on proposed rules to ban menthol in cigarettes and characterizing flavors in cigars. In 2024, the US Health and Human Services Secretary noted that a proposed ban on menthol cigarettes (MCs) would take more time given the high volume of public comments submitted. Objective: To characterize the comments submitted to these dockets, including the sources and types of submissions and themes present in unique comments. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, computer-assisted content analysis was conducted for public comments on the FDA's MC and flavored cigar (FC) proposed federal rules submitted from May to August 2022. Iterative data processing identified form letters and unique comments for thematic analysis in the MC comments and was applied to the FC comments. Informed by a validated codebook, deductive automated content analysis identified themes in unique comments. Analyses were conducted from October 2023 to December 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were identification of comments as form letters, duplicates, or unique, and whether they included arguments for and against the FDA's proposed rules. Results: Of 246 808 comments submitted to these dockets (175 285 comments in the MC docket and 71 523 in the FC docket), most were identified as form letters (169 440 MC comments [97%]; 66 640 FC comments [93%]), with only 4774 comments (2%; 3342 MC comments and 1432 FC comments) identified as unique. Content tied to specific tobacco companies was identified in 44% of comments in the MC docket (77 445 comments) and 10% in the FC docket (6883 comments). Most unique comments opposed these bans (3208 MC comments [96%]; 1418 FC comments [99%]), with themes that addressed loss of revenue and sales (1155 MC comments [35%]; 720 FC comments [49%]), illicit market concern (835 MC comments [25%]; 555 FC comments [38%]), and suggesting more effective routes (607 MC comments [18%]; 420 FC comments [28%]) for action than the proposed policies. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of nearly 250 000 public comments submitted to inform FDA rulemaking, most comments were form letters that reflected tobacco company talking points. These findings raise concerns about corporations co-opting mechanisms for public comment and distorting the prevalence of arguments to influence public health policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.29962
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Comments and Federal Rulemaking for Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars

Andrea C. Villanti, Charity A Ntansah, Kevin R. J. Schroth, Kymberle L. Sterling et al.
JAMA Network Open
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Public Comments and Federal Rulemaking for Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars

Andrea C. Villanti, Charity A Ntansah, Kevin R. J. Schroth, Kymberle L. Sterling, Jon-Patrick Allem, Jeannie Garmon, Aila Altunbilek, Amanda Johnson, Ollie Ganz, CRAIG S. FRYER, Olivia A. Wackowski, Marisa Tomaino
article en

Abstract

Importance: In May 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested public comment on proposed rules to ban menthol in cigarettes and characterizing flavors in cigars. In 2024, the US Health and Human Services Secretary noted that a proposed ban on menthol cigarettes (MCs) would take more time given the high volume of public comments submitted. Objective: To characterize the comments submitted to these dockets, including the sources and types of submissions and themes present in unique comments. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, computer-assisted content analysis was conducted for public comments on the FDA's MC and flavored cigar (FC) proposed federal rules submitted from May to August 2022. Iterative data processing identified form letters and unique comments for thematic analysis in the MC comments and was applied to the FC comments. Informed by a validated codebook, deductive automated content analysis identified themes in unique comments. Analyses were conducted from October 2023 to December 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were identification of comments as form letters, duplicates, or unique, and whether they included arguments for and against the FDA's proposed rules. Results: Of 246 808 comments submitted to these dockets (175 285 comments in the MC docket and 71 523 in the FC docket), most were identified as form letters (169 440 MC comments [97%]; 66 640 FC comments [93%]), with only 4774 comments (2%; 3342 MC comments and 1432 FC comments) identified as unique. Content tied to specific tobacco companies was identified in 44% of comments in the MC docket (77 445 comments) and 10% in the FC docket (6883 comments). Most unique comments opposed these bans (3208 MC comments [96%]; 1418 FC comments [99%]), with themes that addressed loss of revenue and sales (1155 MC comments [35%]; 720 FC comments [49%]), illicit market concern (835 MC comments [25%]; 555 FC comments [38%]), and suggesting more effective routes (607 MC comments [18%]; 420 FC comments [28%]) for action than the proposed policies. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of nearly 250 000 public comments submitted to inform FDA rulemaking, most comments were form letters that reflected tobacco company talking points. These findings raise concerns about corporations co-opting mechanisms for public comment and distorting the prevalence of arguments to influence public health policy.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(8)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Johnson University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.