Pressure effects on ammonia driven chemical soot suppression in methane diffusion flames

Due to the growing interest in ammonia-hydrocarbon co-firing, ammonia’s role in soot formation has gained importance in recent years. However, our understanding of the effect of pressure on ammonia’s soot suppression remains limited, especially for methane flames. Therefore, this study investigates the effects of ammonia and nitrogen dilution on soot formation in methane–air co-flow diffusion flames at elevated pressures from 2 to 8 atm. Methane flames were diluted by mole fractions of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 ( X diluent / X total ). Soot volume fraction (SVF) and soot temperature were measured using Line-of-Sight Attenuation and Spectral Soot Emission techniques, respectively. Results showed that both nitrogen and ammonia suppress soot, with the latter introducing a strong chemical effect that dominates over physical dilution. Ammonia addition lifted the flames and delayed soot formation, shifting the peak soot volume fraction downstream at all pressures. The soot suppression effect of ammonia remained nearly constant with pressure, decreasing the maximum soot yield by 32% ( ± 4%) for each X NH 3 = 0.1 dilution. In contrast, the soot suppression effect of nitrogen decreased with increasing pressure. The pressure-independence of ammonia’s soot suppression is attributed to the competing influences between pressure-enhanced soot formation and ammonia-induced chemical inhibition, while the weakening effect of nitrogen reflects the inability of physical dilution to counter increasingly dominant soot formation mechanisms at elevated pressures. Furthermore, it was found that methane flames are more sensitive to chemical soot suppression through ammonia addition compared to ethylene and n-heptane flames, consistent with observations reported at ambient pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.140992
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressure effects on ammonia driven chemical soot suppression in methane diffusion flames

Ahmet E. Karataş, Oytun Öner, Seth B. Dworkin
Fuel
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
article

Pressure effects on ammonia driven chemical soot suppression in methane diffusion flames

Ahmet E. Karataş, Oytun Öner, Seth B. Dworkin
article en

Abstract

Due to the growing interest in ammonia-hydrocarbon co-firing, ammonia’s role in soot formation has gained importance in recent years. However, our understanding of the effect of pressure on ammonia’s soot suppression remains limited, especially for methane flames. Therefore, this study investigates the effects of ammonia and nitrogen dilution on soot formation in methane–air co-flow diffusion flames at elevated pressures from 2 to 8 atm. Methane flames were diluted by mole fractions of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 ( X diluent / X total ). Soot volume fraction (SVF) and soot temperature were measured using Line-of-Sight Attenuation and Spectral Soot Emission techniques, respectively. Results showed that both nitrogen and ammonia suppress soot, with the latter introducing a strong chemical effect that dominates over physical dilution. Ammonia addition lifted the flames and delayed soot formation, shifting the peak soot volume fraction downstream at all pressures. The soot suppression effect of ammonia remained nearly constant with pressure, decreasing the maximum soot yield by 32% ( ± 4%) for each X NH 3 = 0.1 dilution. In contrast, the soot suppression effect of nitrogen decreased with increasing pressure. The pressure-independence of ammonia’s soot suppression is attributed to the competing influences between pressure-enhanced soot formation and ammonia-induced chemical inhibition, while the weakening effect of nitrogen reflects the inability of physical dilution to counter increasingly dominant soot formation mechanisms at elevated pressures. Furthermore, it was found that methane flames are more sensitive to chemical soot suppression through ammonia addition compared to ethylene and n-heptane flames, consistent with observations reported at ambient pressure.

FuelVol. 429
University of Toronto (CA)
Government of Ontario, Canada Research Chairs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.