Importance of Maximal Force for Modulating Landing Forces

ABSTRACT: Lorbeck, Z, Vannatta, CN, Dobbs, WC, Jaime, SJ, Heinert, BL, Baumann, D, and Kernozek, TW. Importance of maximal force for modulating landing forces. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-Augmented feedback training with and without a dual-task condition may be effective in improving drop landing performance, but some athletes demonstrate minimal improvement. Strength, power, and low-landing vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) have been identified as factors that mitigate anterior cruciate ligament injury risk, but differences between force production capacity and response to augmented feedback is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of force production and jump performance on the ability to integrate augmented feedback to reduce vGRF during drop landing training. Forty-five female, collegiate athletes completed augmented feedback training to reduce peak vGRF during a jump landing task along with isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance metrics. Pretest vGRF, IMTP peak force, CMJ mean propulsive force, mean braking force, propulsive impulse, braking impulse, and dynamic strength index were considered as potential variables in a multiple regression model to predict percent change in vGRF. Pretest vGRF, CMJ propulsive impulse, CMJ braking impulse, and IMTP peak force were retained in the final model (p < 0.001). Isometric midthigh pull peak force was the unique performance metric predicting change in vGRF following training (R2 = 12%). Greater peak IMTP force may indicate a greater capacity to alter vGRF during drop landings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005653
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Importance of Maximal Force for Modulating Landing Forces

Becky Heinert, Thomas W. Kernozek, Ward C. Dobbs, Salvador J. Jaime et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Importance of Maximal Force for Modulating Landing Forces

Becky Heinert, Thomas W. Kernozek, Ward C. Dobbs, Salvador J. Jaime, C. Nathan Vannatta, Douglas Baumann, Zachary Lorbeck
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Lorbeck, Z, Vannatta, CN, Dobbs, WC, Jaime, SJ, Heinert, BL, Baumann, D, and Kernozek, TW. Importance of maximal force for modulating landing forces. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-Augmented feedback training with and without a dual-task condition may be effective in improving drop landing performance, but some athletes demonstrate minimal improvement. Strength, power, and low-landing vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) have been identified as factors that mitigate anterior cruciate ligament injury risk, but differences between force production capacity and response to augmented feedback is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of force production and jump performance on the ability to integrate augmented feedback to reduce vGRF during drop landing training. Forty-five female, collegiate athletes completed augmented feedback training to reduce peak vGRF during a jump landing task along with isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance metrics. Pretest vGRF, IMTP peak force, CMJ mean propulsive force, mean braking force, propulsive impulse, braking impulse, and dynamic strength index were considered as potential variables in a multiple regression model to predict percent change in vGRF. Pretest vGRF, CMJ propulsive impulse, CMJ braking impulse, and IMTP peak force were retained in the final model (p < 0.001). Isometric midthigh pull peak force was the unique performance metric predicting change in vGRF following training (R2 = 12%). Greater peak IMTP force may indicate a greater capacity to alter vGRF during drop landings.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Gundersen Health System (US), University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US), Oregon State University Cascades (US), Winona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.