Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of an animated educational tool for diabetic foot care: A randomized controlled trial and mixed‐methods study in patients with active, in‐remission and high‐risk diabetic foot disease

INTRODUCTION: Patients with diabetes have a 2% annual risk of developing a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Novel methods of reducing the risk of re-ulceration could reduce the cost of diabetic foot disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with active foot disease, a history of prior DFU and/or high-risk feet were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned 50:50 to be educated conventionally by a podiatrist or to view a bespoke foot self-care educational animation developed by the research team for this exploratory pilot study. A modified Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF) questionnaire was used to record knowledge of safe foot care behaviors pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was change in self-care knowledge score. In parallel, a mixed-methods acceptability study was carried out for the 26 patients in the intervention arm, with quantitative data obtained using a 20-item technology acceptance model. Qualitative data were obtained by face-to-face interviews in the clinic setting and examined using thematic analysis. RESULTS: While foot self-care knowledge scores were numerically higher in both groups, only the intervention group showed a statistically significant within-group improvement. There was a trend toward a greater magnitude of increase in the knowledge score in favor of the intervention group, but this did not reach statistical significance. Among the 26 patients who completed the technology acceptability study, the majority of responses were in favor of the educational video. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled and mixed-methods study demonstrated positive results in terms of improvements in foot self-care knowledge and acceptability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70419
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of an animated educational tool for diabetic foot care: A randomized controlled trial and mixed‐methods study in patients with active, in‐remission and high‐risk diabetic foot disease

Derek T. O’Keeffe, Michael Lockhart, Séamus Sreenan, Tommy Kyaw Tun et al.
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of an animated educational tool for diabetic foot care: A randomized controlled trial and mixed‐methods study in patients with active, in‐remission and high‐risk diabetic foot disease

Derek T. O’Keeffe, Michael Lockhart, Séamus Sreenan, Tommy Kyaw Tun, Colin Davenport, Kellie Fortune, John Hubert McDermott, Pir Zainulabdeen Jan Sarhandi, Eimear Daly, Jack Cosgrave
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with diabetes have a 2% annual risk of developing a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Novel methods of reducing the risk of re-ulceration could reduce the cost of diabetic foot disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with active foot disease, a history of prior DFU and/or high-risk feet were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned 50:50 to be educated conventionally by a podiatrist or to view a bespoke foot self-care educational animation developed by the research team for this exploratory pilot study. A modified Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF) questionnaire was used to record knowledge of safe foot care behaviors pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was change in self-care knowledge score. In parallel, a mixed-methods acceptability study was carried out for the 26 patients in the intervention arm, with quantitative data obtained using a 20-item technology acceptance model. Qualitative data were obtained by face-to-face interviews in the clinic setting and examined using thematic analysis. RESULTS: While foot self-care knowledge scores were numerically higher in both groups, only the intervention group showed a statistically significant within-group improvement. There was a trend toward a greater magnitude of increase in the knowledge score in favor of the intervention group, but this did not reach statistical significance. Among the 26 patients who completed the technology acceptability study, the majority of responses were in favor of the educational video. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled and mixed-methods study demonstrated positive results in terms of improvements in foot self-care knowledge and acceptability.

Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown (IE), University Hospital Galway (IE), COPE Galway (IE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.