Reannotation-Free Automatic Recognition Methods for Empty Camera Trap Images Based on MegaDetector Optimization

Camera traps are widely used in wildlife surveys but often generate numerous empty images due to false triggers, which are time-consuming to filter manually. Microsoft’s MegaDetector (MD) is commonly applied for empty image filtering; however, setting its confidence threshold is challenging because a high threshold increases the false negative rate (FNR), whereas a low threshold raises the false positive rate (FPR), making it difficult to achieve a satisfactory trade-off between the two. To address this dilemma, we proposed three MD-based methods with different performance and computational requirements. For FNR-sensitive users, we proposed MD_CS, which integrated context image similarity to achieve a very low FNR while controlling the FPR. For FPR-sensitive users, we proposed MD_CL, which used MD to generate supervisory signals for training a classification model, thereby reducing the FPR while controlling the FNR. For users requiring both low FNR and low FPR, we proposed MD_CS_CL, an ensemble method that combined the strengths of MD_CS and MD_CL. Experimental results on multiple datasets showed that these three methods achieved a significantly better balance between FNR and FPR compared to the threshold adjustment method of the MD method. Specifically, MD_CS maintained an FNR of 1.8–5.9% while controlling the FPR at 4.9–8.5%; MD_CL kept the FPR at 0.4–2.6% while controlling the FNR at 3.8–8.4%; MD_CS_CL achieved an optimal balance with an FNR of 1.4–4.0% and an FPR of 0.3–0.9%. On a server equipped with an RTX 4090 GPU, the three methods processed 6.7, 5.4, and 4.0 images per second, respectively, and none required manual annotation. Consequently, the proposed methods reduce labor costs, improve work efficiency, and provide reliable technical support for large-scale wildlife monitoring by achieving a superior FNR–FPR trade-off compared to MD’s traditional threshold regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16162609
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reannotation-Free Automatic Recognition Methods for Empty Camera Trap Images Based on MegaDetector Optimization

Dengqi Yang, Wen Xiao, Guopeng Ren, Mei Zhang et al.
Animals
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Reannotation-Free Automatic Recognition Methods for Empty Camera Trap Images Based on MegaDetector Optimization

Dengqi Yang, Wen Xiao, Guopeng Ren, Mei Zhang, Rong-Hai Wu, Jing-Xu Yao, Xiao-Wei Li
article en

Abstract

Camera traps are widely used in wildlife surveys but often generate numerous empty images due to false triggers, which are time-consuming to filter manually. Microsoft’s MegaDetector (MD) is commonly applied for empty image filtering; however, setting its confidence threshold is challenging because a high threshold increases the false negative rate (FNR), whereas a low threshold raises the false positive rate (FPR), making it difficult to achieve a satisfactory trade-off between the two. To address this dilemma, we proposed three MD-based methods with different performance and computational requirements. For FNR-sensitive users, we proposed MD_CS, which integrated context image similarity to achieve a very low FNR while controlling the FPR. For FPR-sensitive users, we proposed MD_CL, which used MD to generate supervisory signals for training a classification model, thereby reducing the FPR while controlling the FNR. For users requiring both low FNR and low FPR, we proposed MD_CS_CL, an ensemble method that combined the strengths of MD_CS and MD_CL. Experimental results on multiple datasets showed that these three methods achieved a significantly better balance between FNR and FPR compared to the threshold adjustment method of the MD method. Specifically, MD_CS maintained an FNR of 1.8–5.9% while controlling the FPR at 4.9–8.5%; MD_CL kept the FPR at 0.4–2.6% while controlling the FNR at 3.8–8.4%; MD_CS_CL achieved an optimal balance with an FNR of 1.4–4.0% and an FPR of 0.3–0.9%. On a server equipped with an RTX 4090 GPU, the three methods processed 6.7, 5.4, and 4.0 images per second, respectively, and none required manual annotation. Consequently, the proposed methods reduce labor costs, improve work efficiency, and provide reliable technical support for large-scale wildlife monitoring by achieving a superior FNR–FPR trade-off compared to MD’s traditional threshold regulation.

AnimalsVol. 16(16)
Dali University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.