Virtual Money and Emotional Reality: A Qualitative Analysis of Symbolic Issues in a Stock Market Simulation

This article analyzes how novice investors emotionally experience a stock market simulation conducted with virtual money. Financial simulations are sometimes criticized because they do not reproduce the real financial consequences of investment decisions. However, the fifteen semi-structured interviews conducted after the simulation show that the absence of monetary loss does not eliminate the emotional intensity of the experience. Participants report stress, fear, frustration, disgust, disappointment, satisfaction, and pride. This article argues that virtual money shifts emotional responses toward other forms of issues. Virtual losses are often interpreted as signs of poor decision-making, a lack of competence, or personal failure. Conversely, virtual gains may produce feelings of satisfaction or validation of one’s choices. Ranking also plays a central role: it transforms the exercise into a competitive situation and gives social value to individual performance. The academic bonus constitutes another form of stake because it situates the simulation within a framework aimed at improving academic performance. Based on a thematic analysis of the interviews, this article identifies five dimensions: virtual money as partial protection against financial loss; ranking as a symbolic substitute for financial stakes, the academic bonus as a real consequence of performance, virtual loss as a perceived loss of competence and frustration as a driver of recovery attempts, withdrawal, or disengagement. These findings show that stock market simulations are useful tools for observing how novices assign emotional meaning to gains, losses, ranking and their own competence. This article contributes to the literature on emotions and experimental simulations by demonstrating that emotional intensity does not depend exclusively on exposure to financial loss. Even when virtual, money becomes emotionally significant when it is associated with stakes related to performance, social comparison, academic success, and decision-making identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16081440
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual Money and Emotional Reality: A Qualitative Analysis of Symbolic Issues in a Stock Market Simulation

Kevin Kristoforidis, Alain Finet, Julie Laznicka
Behavioral Sciences
Innovations in Educational Methods
article

Virtual Money and Emotional Reality: A Qualitative Analysis of Symbolic Issues in a Stock Market Simulation

Kevin Kristoforidis, Alain Finet, Julie Laznicka
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes how novice investors emotionally experience a stock market simulation conducted with virtual money. Financial simulations are sometimes criticized because they do not reproduce the real financial consequences of investment decisions. However, the fifteen semi-structured interviews conducted after the simulation show that the absence of monetary loss does not eliminate the emotional intensity of the experience. Participants report stress, fear, frustration, disgust, disappointment, satisfaction, and pride. This article argues that virtual money shifts emotional responses toward other forms of issues. Virtual losses are often interpreted as signs of poor decision-making, a lack of competence, or personal failure. Conversely, virtual gains may produce feelings of satisfaction or validation of one’s choices. Ranking also plays a central role: it transforms the exercise into a competitive situation and gives social value to individual performance. The academic bonus constitutes another form of stake because it situates the simulation within a framework aimed at improving academic performance. Based on a thematic analysis of the interviews, this article identifies five dimensions: virtual money as partial protection against financial loss; ranking as a symbolic substitute for financial stakes, the academic bonus as a real consequence of performance, virtual loss as a perceived loss of competence and frustration as a driver of recovery attempts, withdrawal, or disengagement. These findings show that stock market simulations are useful tools for observing how novices assign emotional meaning to gains, losses, ranking and their own competence. This article contributes to the literature on emotions and experimental simulations by demonstrating that emotional intensity does not depend exclusively on exposure to financial loss. Even when virtual, money becomes emotionally significant when it is associated with stakes related to performance, social comparison, academic success, and decision-making identity.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(8)
University of Mons (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovations in Educational Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.