Reconciling landscape multifunctionality and population-based spatial equity under future land-use scenarios in Jingning County

Rapid land-use change is reshaping both the supply of ecosystem services (ESs) and the spatial distribution of human demand, creating new challenges for equitable landscape management in ecologically sensitive regions. However, how alternative land-management strategies jointly affect landscape multifunctionality (LMF) and population-based spatial equity remains insufficiently understood. This study integrated the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model with ES assessment models to evaluate changes in landscape multifunctionality and population-weighted inequality in Jingning County, China. We calculated the LMF index using a preference-weighted sum approach, with weights empirically derived from a stakeholder survey, to integrate biophysical ES supply with social demand. Population-based spatial equity was quantified using the Gini coefficient of LMF relative to resident population. The results showed that preference-weighted LMF decreased from 0.60 in 2000 to 0.37 in 2020, while the Gini coefficient increased from 0.13 to 0.19, indicating that multifunctionality became less evenly distributed relative to the resident population. Future scenarios revealed distinct trade-offs between overall multifunctionality and its population-weighted distribution. Single-objective scenarios improved selected outcomes but failed to simultaneously optimize both LMF and population-weighted equality. In contrast, the optimization scenario, which incorporates fine-scale forest structure adjustment, achieved relatively higher multifunctionality and a lower Gini coefficient, suggesting that spatially targeted landscape management may help reduce multifunctionality–distribution trade-offs. These findings provide case-based evidence for balancing ecological conservation, multifunctional landscape performance, and the population-weighted distribution of landscape benefits under future land-use change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115337
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconciling landscape multifunctionality and population-based spatial equity under future land-use scenarios in Jingning County

Dubin Dong, Bo Yang, Jian Chen, Mengfei Li et al.
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Reconciling landscape multifunctionality and population-based spatial equity under future land-use scenarios in Jingning County

Dubin Dong, Bo Yang, Jian Chen, Mengfei Li, Lijuan Chen, Yuan Ren, Yan Li, Jun Wang, Wende Yan, Wen Dong
article en

Abstract

Rapid land-use change is reshaping both the supply of ecosystem services (ESs) and the spatial distribution of human demand, creating new challenges for equitable landscape management in ecologically sensitive regions. However, how alternative land-management strategies jointly affect landscape multifunctionality (LMF) and population-based spatial equity remains insufficiently understood. This study integrated the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model with ES assessment models to evaluate changes in landscape multifunctionality and population-weighted inequality in Jingning County, China. We calculated the LMF index using a preference-weighted sum approach, with weights empirically derived from a stakeholder survey, to integrate biophysical ES supply with social demand. Population-based spatial equity was quantified using the Gini coefficient of LMF relative to resident population. The results showed that preference-weighted LMF decreased from 0.60 in 2000 to 0.37 in 2020, while the Gini coefficient increased from 0.13 to 0.19, indicating that multifunctionality became less evenly distributed relative to the resident population. Future scenarios revealed distinct trade-offs between overall multifunctionality and its population-weighted distribution. Single-objective scenarios improved selected outcomes but failed to simultaneously optimize both LMF and population-weighted equality. In contrast, the optimization scenario, which incorporates fine-scale forest structure adjustment, achieved relatively higher multifunctionality and a lower Gini coefficient, suggesting that spatially targeted landscape management may help reduce multifunctionality–distribution trade-offs. These findings provide case-based evidence for balancing ecological conservation, multifunctional landscape performance, and the population-weighted distribution of landscape benefits under future land-use change.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 190
Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN), Zhejiang A & F University (CN), Central South University (CN), Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve (CN), Jingning County People's Hospital (CN), Zhejiang Academy of Forestry (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang University Student Science and Technology Innovation Activity Plan, Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.