Should I ride or not?: A conjoint study on young riders’ nighttime e-scooter use after drinking

Alcohol-impaired riding is a leading contributor to e-scooter crashes and injuries, especially among young adults during nighttime hours. Yet, research on the decision-making processes underlying this risky behavior remains limited. Based on a stated preference approach, this study quantifies the situational factors influencing young people’s likelihood of riding e-scooters after drinking alcohol at night. An online conjoint experiment was conducted with 717 participants aged 16–35 from Switzerland, Germany, and Denmark. Respondents evaluated realistic scenarios varying five attributes: type and availability of transport alternatives, e-scooter availability, peer influence, and perceived security. Hierarchical Bayes modeling and choice simulations revealed peer influence and the presence of viable transport alternatives as the most decisive factors, each accounting for over a third of the decision weight. Scenarios where peers opted for safer alternatives or where public transport was directly available significantly reduced the likelihood of alcohol-impaired e-scooter use. Men and frequent e-scooter users showed higher risk propensity, and more permissive attitudes toward drunk riding associated with both past behavior and higher scenario-based e-scooter riding likelihoods after drinking alcohol. Implications include the need for social-norms campaigns leveraging peer dynamics, improved late-night transport provision, and restricted e-scooter availability in nightlife hotspots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107426
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should I ride or not?: A conjoint study on young riders’ nighttime e-scooter use after drinking

Juliane Anke, Felix Wilhelm Siebert, Désirée Hagmann, David Schackmann et al.
Safety Science
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Should I ride or not?: A conjoint study on young riders’ nighttime e-scooter use after drinking

Juliane Anke, Felix Wilhelm Siebert, Désirée Hagmann, David Schackmann, Madlen Ringhand, Tanja Stoll, Markus Hackenfort
article en

Abstract

Alcohol-impaired riding is a leading contributor to e-scooter crashes and injuries, especially among young adults during nighttime hours. Yet, research on the decision-making processes underlying this risky behavior remains limited. Based on a stated preference approach, this study quantifies the situational factors influencing young people’s likelihood of riding e-scooters after drinking alcohol at night. An online conjoint experiment was conducted with 717 participants aged 16–35 from Switzerland, Germany, and Denmark. Respondents evaluated realistic scenarios varying five attributes: type and availability of transport alternatives, e-scooter availability, peer influence, and perceived security. Hierarchical Bayes modeling and choice simulations revealed peer influence and the presence of viable transport alternatives as the most decisive factors, each accounting for over a third of the decision weight. Scenarios where peers opted for safer alternatives or where public transport was directly available significantly reduced the likelihood of alcohol-impaired e-scooter use. Men and frequent e-scooter users showed higher risk propensity, and more permissive attitudes toward drunk riding associated with both past behavior and higher scenario-based e-scooter riding likelihoods after drinking alcohol. Implications include the need for social-norms campaigns leveraging peer dynamics, improved late-night transport provision, and restricted e-scooter availability in nightlife hotspots.

Safety ScienceVol. 205
Human Factors (Norway) (NO), Institute of Transportation Engineers (US), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.