“Who Provides Support?”: A Qualitative Study of Professionals' Perspectives on Aborted Cancer Surgery Based on the Fundamentals of Care Framework

AIM: To explore healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of patients with aborted cancer surgery. DESIGN: A multicentre study with a qualitative research design with focus group interviews according to Krueger and Casey. The study was guided by the Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted, consisting of a diverse group of twelve healthcare professionals from three accredited comprehensive cancer centers and university hospitals. Data were collected in April-May 2025. A semi-structured interview guide was used to support the interviews. Data analysis was deductively analysed using directed content analysis guided by the Fundamentals of Care framework. RESULTS: The care context, its organization, culture and policies, makes it difficult to maintain safe person-centered care for patients undergoing aborted cancer surgery. The contact nurse plays an important role in upholding safe person-centered care despite these contextual barriers. Surprisingly, our findings showed that physical needs were entirely absent from the professionals' accounts. It was evident that nursing competence was underutilized in the care chain, particularly among the registered nurses on the ward. The need for supervision was clearly emphasized by all professional groups except the surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining safe, person-centered care for patients undergoing aborted cancer surgery is hindered by organizational, cultural, and policy-related barriers within the care context. Despite these challenges, the contact nurse remains a key facilitator of person-centered care. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? The study addressed how organizational, cultural, and policy-related conditions within the care context make it difficult to maintain safe, person-centred care for patients undergoing aborted cancer surgery. What were the main findings? The contact nurse plays a crucial role in sustaining safety and person-centered care despite these contextual barriers. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research will impact healthcare organizations and multidisciplinary cancer teams by informing policy and practice aimed at strengthening person-centred and safe cancer care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement was required because the study focused on professional experiences, without involving patient data or issues affecting patients or the public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70733
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Who Provides Support?”: A Qualitative Study of Professionals' Perspectives on Aborted Cancer Surgery Based on the Fundamentals of Care Framework

Anna Persdotter, Jenny Drott, Carina Wennerholm, Tina Gustavell
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

“Who Provides Support?”: A Qualitative Study of Professionals' Perspectives on Aborted Cancer Surgery Based on the Fundamentals of Care Framework

Anna Persdotter, Jenny Drott, Carina Wennerholm, Tina Gustavell
article en

Abstract

AIM: To explore healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of patients with aborted cancer surgery. DESIGN: A multicentre study with a qualitative research design with focus group interviews according to Krueger and Casey. The study was guided by the Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted, consisting of a diverse group of twelve healthcare professionals from three accredited comprehensive cancer centers and university hospitals. Data were collected in April-May 2025. A semi-structured interview guide was used to support the interviews. Data analysis was deductively analysed using directed content analysis guided by the Fundamentals of Care framework. RESULTS: The care context, its organization, culture and policies, makes it difficult to maintain safe person-centered care for patients undergoing aborted cancer surgery. The contact nurse plays an important role in upholding safe person-centered care despite these contextual barriers. Surprisingly, our findings showed that physical needs were entirely absent from the professionals' accounts. It was evident that nursing competence was underutilized in the care chain, particularly among the registered nurses on the ward. The need for supervision was clearly emphasized by all professional groups except the surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining safe, person-centered care for patients undergoing aborted cancer surgery is hindered by organizational, cultural, and policy-related barriers within the care context. Despite these challenges, the contact nurse remains a key facilitator of person-centered care. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? The study addressed how organizational, cultural, and policy-related conditions within the care context make it difficult to maintain safe, person-centred care for patients undergoing aborted cancer surgery. What were the main findings? The contact nurse plays a crucial role in sustaining safety and person-centered care despite these contextual barriers. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research will impact healthcare organizations and multidisciplinary cancer teams by informing policy and practice aimed at strengthening person-centred and safe cancer care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement was required because the study focused on professional experiences, without involving patient data or issues affecting patients or the public.

Journal of Advanced Nursing
Linköping University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Industrial Development Center (Sweden) (SE), Linköping University Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.