Extreme events and habitats as comparative tools for assessing scaled ecosystem responses to stressors in aquatic systems

Two types of extremes are often used as indicators of future change: Extreme climate events and extreme habitats. These extremes can be useful gauges of environmental change, but only if biological, spatial, and temporal scopes are aligned between the extreme and the future change it is hypothesized to mirror. In general, short-lived extreme events provide insights towards acute responses but are not as suitable for assessing long-term ecological or evolutionary change. Extreme habitats can reveal potential long-term adaptations, but community structure and trophic interactions can be challenging to assess due to species often following habitat-dependent evolutionary paths, and these environments tend to undergo gradual rather than rapid ecological change. Community structure and species interactions may further differ for both types of extremes between biological response levels. In cases of a mismatch between the size of an extreme habitat or event and its comparative system, it will be more appropriate to study biological responses at smaller geographic scales than the habitat or event occurs. Here, we explore the opportunities and limitations of a variety of extremes in marine and freshwater systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Climate
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0001032
Primary Topic
Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extreme events and habitats as comparative tools for assessing scaled ecosystem responses to stressors in aquatic systems

Tianfei Xue, Alexander W. Mott, Evie S. Brahmstedt, Hadis Miraly et al.
PLOS Climate
Physiological and biochemical adaptations
article

Extreme events and habitats as comparative tools for assessing scaled ecosystem responses to stressors in aquatic systems

Tianfei Xue, Alexander W. Mott, Evie S. Brahmstedt, Hadis Miraly, Xinyu Sun, Kyle A. Emery, Katherine E. Dale, Atefeh Hosseini, Walter A. Rich, Joshua Culpepper, Audrey Thellman
article en

Abstract

Two types of extremes are often used as indicators of future change: Extreme climate events and extreme habitats. These extremes can be useful gauges of environmental change, but only if biological, spatial, and temporal scopes are aligned between the extreme and the future change it is hypothesized to mirror. In general, short-lived extreme events provide insights towards acute responses but are not as suitable for assessing long-term ecological or evolutionary change. Extreme habitats can reveal potential long-term adaptations, but community structure and trophic interactions can be challenging to assess due to species often following habitat-dependent evolutionary paths, and these environments tend to undergo gradual rather than rapid ecological change. Community structure and species interactions may further differ for both types of extremes between biological response levels. In cases of a mismatch between the size of an extreme habitat or event and its comparative system, it will be more appropriate to study biological responses at smaller geographic scales than the habitat or event occurs. Here, we explore the opportunities and limitations of a variety of extremes in marine and freshwater systems.

PLOS ClimateVol. 5(8)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Kansas (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US), East Carolina University (US), York University (CA), Southeastern Louisiana University (US), Cornell University (US), GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE), Michigan United (US), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Physiological and biochemical adaptations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.