Systematic review of fatigue assessment instruments for systemic lupus erythematosus: psychometric validation with COSMIN 2.0 Guidelines

OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate the methodological quality and psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for fatigue assessment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. METHODS: A systematic search was performed across eight databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed) from inception to June 12, 2026. Eligible studies focused on developing/psychometrically validating SLE fatigue-specific PROMs with explicit reporting of at least one psychometric property. Study methodological quality and PROM psychometric performance were assessed in accordance with COSMIN 2.0 guidelines; measurement property evidence for each PROM was synthesized across eligible studies, and evidence certainty evaluated via a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation(GRADE)system. RESULTS: Fifteen studies involving six distinct PROMs were included. No instrument was conclusively recommendable for clinical practice/research due to insufficient high-certainty evidence, particularly for cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance and criterion validity. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) was the most promising, with high-quality evidence for five core psychometric properties (content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity hypothesis testing, responsiveness), and it assesses physical/mental fatigue and their impacts on functional status and daily living. CONCLUSIONS: A critical gap exists in fully validated, high-quality SLE-specific PROMs for fatigue assessment. FACIT-Fatigue is the most viable tool for this population but requires further rigorous psychometric validation. Future research should prioritize comprehensive validation of FACIT-Fatigue (e.g., supplementing cross-cultural and criterion validity evidence) and the development/validation of SLE-specific PROMs to quantify fatigue and its disease-specific manifestations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD420251272840).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lara D. Veeken
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag449
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review of fatigue assessment instruments for systemic lupus erythematosus: psychometric validation with COSMIN 2.0 Guidelines

Xiaocha Zhu, Chaoqian Li, Suxiang Liu, Qingqing Liu
Lara D. Veeken
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Systematic review of fatigue assessment instruments for systemic lupus erythematosus: psychometric validation with COSMIN 2.0 Guidelines

Xiaocha Zhu, Chaoqian Li, Suxiang Liu, Qingqing Liu
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate the methodological quality and psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for fatigue assessment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. METHODS: A systematic search was performed across eight databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed) from inception to June 12, 2026. Eligible studies focused on developing/psychometrically validating SLE fatigue-specific PROMs with explicit reporting of at least one psychometric property. Study methodological quality and PROM psychometric performance were assessed in accordance with COSMIN 2.0 guidelines; measurement property evidence for each PROM was synthesized across eligible studies, and evidence certainty evaluated via a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation(GRADE)system. RESULTS: Fifteen studies involving six distinct PROMs were included. No instrument was conclusively recommendable for clinical practice/research due to insufficient high-certainty evidence, particularly for cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance and criterion validity. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) was the most promising, with high-quality evidence for five core psychometric properties (content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity hypothesis testing, responsiveness), and it assesses physical/mental fatigue and their impacts on functional status and daily living. CONCLUSIONS: A critical gap exists in fully validated, high-quality SLE-specific PROMs for fatigue assessment. FACIT-Fatigue is the most viable tool for this population but requires further rigorous psychometric validation. Future research should prioritize comprehensive validation of FACIT-Fatigue (e.g., supplementing cross-cultural and criterion validity evidence) and the development/validation of SLE-specific PROMs to quantify fatigue and its disease-specific manifestations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD420251272840).

Lara D. Veeken
Zhejiang International Studies University (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.