Comparison of mesquite and arabic gum with three different starch derivatives for microencapsulation of lemon essential oil by spray-drying

Abstract Among the most relevant advances in new encapsulating materials are modified starch derivatives, which exhibit emulsifying capacity and form low-viscosity solutions, competing with the properties of arabic gum. Another promising alternative is the use of mesquite gum. For the rational application of encapsulating agents, it is essential to characterize their properties according to each specific use. In this study, three modified starches (N-Lok, Capsul, and National-46) were evaluated in comparison with arabic gum ( Acacia senegal ) and mesquite gum ( Prosopis spp ), with the aim of encapsulating lemon essential oil through spray drying. Three oil-to-encapsulant ratios (0.5, 0.6, and 0.7) were studied, determining the characteristics of the oil/water emulsions and the properties of the resulting microcapsules. The results showed that N-Lok starch, at a 0.5 ratio, produced the emulsion with the smallest droplet size, the highest encapsulation efficiency, and the lowest mean volumetric diameter of the microcapsules. In general, the starches yielded nearly spherical and defect-free microcapsules, except for those obtained with National-46. In contrast, the microcapsules produced with arabic gum and mesquite gum exhibited rough, dented surfaces. Regarding oil retention over time, the highest efficiency was observed with arabic gum, followed by N-Lok starch and mesquite gum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-026-06853-y
Primary Topic
Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of mesquite and arabic gum with three different starch derivatives for microencapsulation of lemon essential oil by spray-drying

R. Pedroza‐Islas, José L. López-Cervantes, Jesús Gracia-Fadrique, Martín Ramón Porras-Godínez
Journal of Food Science and Technology
Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
article

Comparison of mesquite and arabic gum with three different starch derivatives for microencapsulation of lemon essential oil by spray-drying

R. Pedroza‐Islas, José L. López-Cervantes, Jesús Gracia-Fadrique, Martín Ramón Porras-Godínez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Among the most relevant advances in new encapsulating materials are modified starch derivatives, which exhibit emulsifying capacity and form low-viscosity solutions, competing with the properties of arabic gum. Another promising alternative is the use of mesquite gum. For the rational application of encapsulating agents, it is essential to characterize their properties according to each specific use. In this study, three modified starches (N-Lok, Capsul, and National-46) were evaluated in comparison with arabic gum ( Acacia senegal ) and mesquite gum ( Prosopis spp ), with the aim of encapsulating lemon essential oil through spray drying. Three oil-to-encapsulant ratios (0.5, 0.6, and 0.7) were studied, determining the characteristics of the oil/water emulsions and the properties of the resulting microcapsules. The results showed that N-Lok starch, at a 0.5 ratio, produced the emulsion with the smallest droplet size, the highest encapsulation efficiency, and the lowest mean volumetric diameter of the microcapsules. In general, the starches yielded nearly spherical and defect-free microcapsules, except for those obtained with National-46. In contrast, the microcapsules produced with arabic gum and mesquite gum exhibited rough, dented surfaces. Regarding oil retention over time, the highest efficiency was observed with arabic gum, followed by N-Lok starch and mesquite gum.

Journal of Food Science and Technology
Universidad Iberoamericana (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.