Knee valgus proprioception, muscle activity, patient-reported outcomes and dynamic balance control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cross-sectional case–control study

Abstract Background Proprioceptive deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are commonly assessed using sagittal-plane, nonweight-bearing tasks that may not reflect the demands of functional activities. This study evaluated the test–retest reliability and discriminative validity of a weight-bearing knee valgus discrimination task (Knee-VEDA) and compared proprioceptive acuity, muscle activity, dynamic balance, and patient-reported outcomes between individuals with ACLR and healthy controls. Methods Sixty-three participants (32 ACLR, 31 controls) performed the Knee-VEDA with concurrent surface electromyography (sEMG) of seven lower-limb muscles. Test–retest reliability was assessed. Dynamic balance and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Y-Balance Test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results The Knee-VEDA demonstrated acceptable-to-good test–retest reliability (ACLR ICC = 0.84; controls ICC = 0.64) and acceptable discriminative validity (AUC = 0.835, p < 0.001). The ACLR group exhibited significantly poorer proprioception in the operated limb compared with their intact limb and controls ( p < 0.001). sEMG analysis revealed not statistically significant between-group differences in lower-limb muscle activity. ACLR participants also demonstrated inferior Y-Balance performance compared with controls ( p = 0.02). In the ACLR group, better Knee-VEDA scores correlated with better Y-Balance ( r = 0.50, p < 0.001), and better KOOS symptoms scores ( r = 0.55, p = 0.001). Conclusions The Knee-VEDA may be a useful tool for assessing weight-bearing knee proprioception after ACLR, showing acceptable test–retest reliability and discriminative validity. After ACL reconstruction, operated-limb proprioceptive acuity was found to be reduced during the valgus task. Further validation is needed before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knee Surgery and Related Research
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-026-00341-5
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knee valgus proprioception, muscle activity, patient-reported outcomes and dynamic balance control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cross-sectional case–control study

Adrian Pranata, Jinglei Huang, Weixin Zhang, Mengde Lyu et al.
Knee Surgery and Related Research
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Knee valgus proprioception, muscle activity, patient-reported outcomes and dynamic balance control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cross-sectional case–control study

Adrian Pranata, Jinglei Huang, Weixin Zhang, Mengde Lyu, Huaibin Qian, Qingrong Xu, Joshua Farragher, Ji Sun, Jia Han, Roger Adams, Evangelos Pappas
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Proprioceptive deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are commonly assessed using sagittal-plane, nonweight-bearing tasks that may not reflect the demands of functional activities. This study evaluated the test–retest reliability and discriminative validity of a weight-bearing knee valgus discrimination task (Knee-VEDA) and compared proprioceptive acuity, muscle activity, dynamic balance, and patient-reported outcomes between individuals with ACLR and healthy controls. Methods Sixty-three participants (32 ACLR, 31 controls) performed the Knee-VEDA with concurrent surface electromyography (sEMG) of seven lower-limb muscles. Test–retest reliability was assessed. Dynamic balance and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Y-Balance Test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results The Knee-VEDA demonstrated acceptable-to-good test–retest reliability (ACLR ICC = 0.84; controls ICC = 0.64) and acceptable discriminative validity (AUC = 0.835, p < 0.001). The ACLR group exhibited significantly poorer proprioception in the operated limb compared with their intact limb and controls ( p < 0.001). sEMG analysis revealed not statistically significant between-group differences in lower-limb muscle activity. ACLR participants also demonstrated inferior Y-Balance performance compared with controls ( p = 0.02). In the ACLR group, better Knee-VEDA scores correlated with better Y-Balance ( r = 0.50, p < 0.001), and better KOOS symptoms scores ( r = 0.55, p = 0.001). Conclusions The Knee-VEDA may be a useful tool for assessing weight-bearing knee proprioception after ACLR, showing acceptable test–retest reliability and discriminative validity. After ACL reconstruction, operated-limb proprioceptive acuity was found to be reduced during the valgus task. Further validation is needed before clinical application.

Knee Surgery and Related ResearchVol. 38(1)
University of Canberra (AU), Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences (CN), People's Liberation Army 411 Hospital (CN), RMIT University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.