Lost in translation: how government-initiated user-led organisations diluted the disabled people’s movement in the UK

In response to the Special Issue question ‘Are things getting better?’, this article contends that the political power of disabled people in the UK has deteriorated due to the state’s co-optation of the disabled people’s movement. Using a composite auto-ethnographic case study of a User-Led Organisation I call ‘Sunnyside’, the paper traces how the promotion of User-Led Organisations and Direct Payments policy paradoxically weakened grassroots activism in the UK. By evaluating three fundamental principles of authentic user-led practice, grassroots control, social model adherence, and constituent accountability, the article reveals how funding regimes have reduced radical principles to administrative branding. The paper concludes that resisting structural and institutional diminishment of disabled people’s priorities and lives requires the movement to reclaim its history, establish financial independence, and implement a robust accreditation system in order to resist future incorporation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2026.2712605
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in translation: how government-initiated user-led organisations diluted the disabled people’s movement in the UK

Harvey Cowe
Disability & Society
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Lost in translation: how government-initiated user-led organisations diluted the disabled people’s movement in the UK

Harvey Cowe
article en

Abstract

In response to the Special Issue question ‘Are things getting better?’, this article contends that the political power of disabled people in the UK has deteriorated due to the state’s co-optation of the disabled people’s movement. Using a composite auto-ethnographic case study of a User-Led Organisation I call ‘Sunnyside’, the paper traces how the promotion of User-Led Organisations and Direct Payments policy paradoxically weakened grassroots activism in the UK. By evaluating three fundamental principles of authentic user-led practice, grassroots control, social model adherence, and constituent accountability, the article reveals how funding regimes have reduced radical principles to administrative branding. The paper concludes that resisting structural and institutional diminishment of disabled people’s priorities and lives requires the movement to reclaim its history, establish financial independence, and implement a robust accreditation system in order to resist future incorporation.

Disability & Society
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.