Diverging Perspectives: A Qualitative Study of How Physicians and Informal Caregivers Perceive End-of-Life Communication

IntroductionPatients often express a desire to discuss their end of life with physicians, yet patient-provider communication regarding this topic is often poor. Insufficient communication may prevent dying older adults from receiving care that aligns with their preferences. Physicians and informal caregivers may assess the quality of their end-of-life communications differently; however, it is unclear whether these misalignments undermine their quality of care.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured focus groups with 19 physicians who routinely provide end-of-life care and 21 recently bereaved informal caregivers of older adults. We analyzed transcripts using an inductive, line-by-line coding approach to generate themes grounded in participant experiences.ResultsWe identified two overarching themes highlighting differences in physician and caregiver perspectives regarding end-of-life communication: roles and responsibilities; and perceived barriers to end-of-life planning. Physicians attributed ineffective communication to patients' poor health literacy, and felt that in-depth end-of-life planning conversations were outside their scope of practice. Bereaved caregivers attributed poor communication to their fear of challenging medical authority, and limited information exchange with physicians. Physicians emphasized financial barriers to end-of-life planning, whereas caregivers emphasized their unmet needs for physician guidance.ConclusionsPhysicians and bereaved caregivers differed in how end-of-life communication is experienced, evaluated, and acted upon, which exacerbated pre-existing informational barriers for caregivers and created an additional obstacle to achieving goal-concordant care. Physicians' overestimation of patients' baseline end-of-life knowledge coupled with caregivers' unaddressed informational needs and difficulty challenging medical authority at the end of life may limit the quality and delivery of end-of-life care that aligns with patient preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261476560
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diverging Perspectives: A Qualitative Study of How Physicians and Informal Caregivers Perceive End-of-Life Communication

Lucie Kalousová, Elizabeth A. Luth, Emily Schuler, Clifford Ross et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Diverging Perspectives: A Qualitative Study of How Physicians and Informal Caregivers Perceive End-of-Life Communication

Lucie Kalousová, Elizabeth A. Luth, Emily Schuler, Clifford Ross, Zhe Zhang, Benmun Damul, Kafayat Mahmoud, Nashell Wilson, Deborah Carr, Zheng Lian, Brina Ratangee, Sarah E. Koch
article en

Abstract

IntroductionPatients often express a desire to discuss their end of life with physicians, yet patient-provider communication regarding this topic is often poor. Insufficient communication may prevent dying older adults from receiving care that aligns with their preferences. Physicians and informal caregivers may assess the quality of their end-of-life communications differently; however, it is unclear whether these misalignments undermine their quality of care.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured focus groups with 19 physicians who routinely provide end-of-life care and 21 recently bereaved informal caregivers of older adults. We analyzed transcripts using an inductive, line-by-line coding approach to generate themes grounded in participant experiences.ResultsWe identified two overarching themes highlighting differences in physician and caregiver perspectives regarding end-of-life communication: roles and responsibilities; and perceived barriers to end-of-life planning. Physicians attributed ineffective communication to patients' poor health literacy, and felt that in-depth end-of-life planning conversations were outside their scope of practice. Bereaved caregivers attributed poor communication to their fear of challenging medical authority, and limited information exchange with physicians. Physicians emphasized financial barriers to end-of-life planning, whereas caregivers emphasized their unmet needs for physician guidance.ConclusionsPhysicians and bereaved caregivers differed in how end-of-life communication is experienced, evaluated, and acted upon, which exacerbated pre-existing informational barriers for caregivers and created an additional obstacle to achieving goal-concordant care. Physicians' overestimation of patients' baseline end-of-life knowledge coupled with caregivers' unaddressed informational needs and difficulty challenging medical authority at the end of life may limit the quality and delivery of end-of-life care that aligns with patient preferences.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Johnson University (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.