Compartment-specific lymph node ratio improves prognostic stratification beyond conventional nodal staging in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) pN staging is based only on metastatic lymph node number, ignoring anatomical distribution. Lymphatic dissemination is hierarchical, leading to survival heterogeneity within the same pN category. We evaluate whether integrating compartment-specific nodal involvement improves prognostic discrimination. This retrospective study included 1,558 patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy between 2015 and 2018. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort ( n = 1067) and validation cohort ( n = 491). Compartment-specific lymph node metastasis rates (csLNR) in D1 and D2 compartments were combined to construct a csLNR staging system. A nomogram incorporating csLNR was developed and compared with conventional lymph node ratio (LNR)-based and pTNM(AJCC8th) staging systems. Five-year overall survival(OS) differed significantly across csLNR categories (89.1%, 66.3%, 43.5%, and 8.7% for csLNR0, csLNR1, csLNR2/3, and csLNR4, respectively; P < 0.001). Within pN2 and pN3 subgroups, csLNR further stratified patients into distinct prognostic groups with significantly different survival outcomes(pN2: 84.62%, 71.12% and 37.18% for csLNR0, csLNR1 and csLNR2/3; pN3: 62.10%, 46.82% and 13.33% for csLNR1, csLNR2/3 and csLNR4). csLNR remained independently associated with OS (HR = 10.47, 95CI%;6.77–16.20, P < 0.001). The csLNR-based nomogram showed improved discrimination compared with LNR-based and pTNM models in both training (C-index 0.804 vs. 0.778 vs. 0.759) and validation cohorts (0.768 vs. 0.744 vs. 0.739). Incorporating anatomical nodal metastatic distribution into quantitative nodal assessment improves prognostic stratification over pN staging. The csLNR model reveals heterogeneity within conventional nodal categories and facilitates individualized postoperative risk stratification in GC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16701-z
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compartment-specific lymph node ratio improves prognostic stratification beyond conventional nodal staging in gastric cancer

Caiming Weng, Jianwei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Lili Shen et al.
BMC Cancer
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Compartment-specific lymph node ratio improves prognostic stratification beyond conventional nodal staging in gastric cancer

Caiming Weng, Jianwei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Lili Shen, Lingkang Zhang, Qichen He, Changming Huang, Guojun Xia, Chaohui Zheng, Gang Wang, Hualong Zheng
article en

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) pN staging is based only on metastatic lymph node number, ignoring anatomical distribution. Lymphatic dissemination is hierarchical, leading to survival heterogeneity within the same pN category. We evaluate whether integrating compartment-specific nodal involvement improves prognostic discrimination. This retrospective study included 1,558 patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy between 2015 and 2018. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort ( n = 1067) and validation cohort ( n = 491). Compartment-specific lymph node metastasis rates (csLNR) in D1 and D2 compartments were combined to construct a csLNR staging system. A nomogram incorporating csLNR was developed and compared with conventional lymph node ratio (LNR)-based and pTNM(AJCC8th) staging systems. Five-year overall survival(OS) differed significantly across csLNR categories (89.1%, 66.3%, 43.5%, and 8.7% for csLNR0, csLNR1, csLNR2/3, and csLNR4, respectively; P < 0.001). Within pN2 and pN3 subgroups, csLNR further stratified patients into distinct prognostic groups with significantly different survival outcomes(pN2: 84.62%, 71.12% and 37.18% for csLNR0, csLNR1 and csLNR2/3; pN3: 62.10%, 46.82% and 13.33% for csLNR1, csLNR2/3 and csLNR4). csLNR remained independently associated with OS (HR = 10.47, 95CI%;6.77–16.20, P < 0.001). The csLNR-based nomogram showed improved discrimination compared with LNR-based and pTNM models in both training (C-index 0.804 vs. 0.778 vs. 0.759) and validation cohorts (0.768 vs. 0.744 vs. 0.739). Incorporating anatomical nodal metastatic distribution into quantitative nodal assessment improves prognostic stratification over pN staging. The csLNR model reveals heterogeneity within conventional nodal categories and facilitates individualized postoperative risk stratification in GC.

BMC Cancer
Fujian Medical University (CN), Xian Central Hospital (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (CN), Shaoxing People's Hospital (CN), Union Hospital (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.