Comparing hedonic and machine learning models in residential property valuation: evidence from sub-market analysis in Italy

Purpose This study aims to compare the predictive performance, robustness and interpretability of traditional hedonic regression and machine learning (ML) models in residential property valuation. While regression-based approaches estimate marginal prices directly, they may be limited in capturing non-linearities and multicollinearity. Conversely, artificial intelligence (AI) models provide greater flexibility but are more prone to overfitting and often lack transparency. Explainable AI (XAI) is integrated to improve the interpretation of price-formation mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach An exploratory case study compares multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF) and a hybrid stacking model combining ANN and RF. The analysis includes variable definition, data collection and preprocessing, model specification and implementation and validation through training and k-fold cross-validation. To enhance interpretability, permutation feature importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations values are applied. Findings The empirical application focuses on two Osservatorio del Mercato Immobiliare zones (B1 and B2) of Padua (Italy). Model performance is strongly influenced by sample size, data heterogeneity and validation strategy. Stacking provides a favourable balance between predictive accuracy and robustness, particularly in the larger and more heterogeneous B2 sample, whereas ANN and RF are more prone to overfitting in smaller and less heterogeneous data sets (B1). MLR proves more stable across training and cross-validation phases. XAI confirms the central role of floor area in price determination, together with maintenance condition, construction period and service availability. Model performance should be interpreted as a trade-off between accuracy, stability and transparency. Originality/value This study provides an integrated comparison of econometric, ML and XAI-based approaches within a homogeneous housing market. It jointly evaluates predictive accuracy, robustness and interpretability, allowing different modelling strategies to be evaluated not only in terms of forecasting performance but also in relation to their transparency and stability. The empirical application to the Padua residential market provides useful evidence for researchers, valuers and decision makers interested in the use of advanced predictive tools for property value forecasting and market analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhma-03-2026-0065
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing hedonic and machine learning models in residential property valuation: evidence from sub-market analysis in Italy

Gabriella Maselli, Antonio Nestıcò, Laura Gabrielli
International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis
Housing Market and Economics
article

Comparing hedonic and machine learning models in residential property valuation: evidence from sub-market analysis in Italy

Gabriella Maselli, Antonio Nestıcò, Laura Gabrielli
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to compare the predictive performance, robustness and interpretability of traditional hedonic regression and machine learning (ML) models in residential property valuation. While regression-based approaches estimate marginal prices directly, they may be limited in capturing non-linearities and multicollinearity. Conversely, artificial intelligence (AI) models provide greater flexibility but are more prone to overfitting and often lack transparency. Explainable AI (XAI) is integrated to improve the interpretation of price-formation mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach An exploratory case study compares multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF) and a hybrid stacking model combining ANN and RF. The analysis includes variable definition, data collection and preprocessing, model specification and implementation and validation through training and k-fold cross-validation. To enhance interpretability, permutation feature importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations values are applied. Findings The empirical application focuses on two Osservatorio del Mercato Immobiliare zones (B1 and B2) of Padua (Italy). Model performance is strongly influenced by sample size, data heterogeneity and validation strategy. Stacking provides a favourable balance between predictive accuracy and robustness, particularly in the larger and more heterogeneous B2 sample, whereas ANN and RF are more prone to overfitting in smaller and less heterogeneous data sets (B1). MLR proves more stable across training and cross-validation phases. XAI confirms the central role of floor area in price determination, together with maintenance condition, construction period and service availability. Model performance should be interpreted as a trade-off between accuracy, stability and transparency. Originality/value This study provides an integrated comparison of econometric, ML and XAI-based approaches within a homogeneous housing market. It jointly evaluates predictive accuracy, robustness and interpretability, allowing different modelling strategies to be evaluated not only in terms of forecasting performance but also in relation to their transparency and stability. The empirical application to the Padua residential market provides useful evidence for researchers, valuers and decision makers interested in the use of advanced predictive tools for property value forecasting and market analysis.

International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis
University of Salerno (IT), University of Sannio (IT), University of Ferrara (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.