Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: Findings from cohort C of the OPAL phase 2 trial
BACKGROUND: Despite therapeutic improvements in advanced ovarian cancer (aOC), prognosis remains poor for patients with residual disease after cytoreductive surgery. Reported here are results from cohort C of the phase 1b/2 OPAL study of a neoadjuvant poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor for aOC. METHODS: Eligible adults with newly diagnosed stage III/IV homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) aOC and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 were randomized 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane chemotherapy (platinum-taxane) or niraparib. During the prescreening period, patients received 1 run-in cycle of carboplatin-paclitaxel. After neoadjuvant therapy, patients with an unconfirmed complete/partial response (CR/PR) or stable disease per RECIST could undergo interval debulking surgery (IDS), followed by adjuvant platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy. After adjuvant therapy, patients without progression received niraparib-based maintenance treatment. Primary endpoint was pre-IDS unconfirmed investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST. Secondary endpoints included safety. RESULTS: Of 36 patients randomized, 19 received niraparib and 17, platinum-taxane. Baseline demographics and characteristics were similar between arms. Overall, the pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR was 31.6% (CR/PR, 0/31.6%) with niraparib and 70.6% (CR/PR, 0/70.6%) with platinum-taxane. The pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR (80% CI) difference was -39.0% (-56.8% to -17.7%), favoring platinum-taxane. The trial was closed early for futility. Grade ≥3 adverse-event rates during the neoadjuvant period were 42% and 59% in the niraparib and platinum-taxane arms, respectively. No fatal serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed HRd aOC, neoadjuvant niraparib did not improve ORR versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy, and the trial was discontinued. The safety profile was consistent with those of previous PARP inhibitor studies.
Authors
- Brunella Felicetti
- Evi Bakirtzi
- Lucía González Cortijo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2082-670X)
- Xing Zeng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8229-5903)
- Ana Godoy Ortiz
- J Belotte
- Raúl Márquez Vázquez
- Fernanda B. Musa
- Diane Provencher
- Vishvajit Aghera
- Dan-Arin Silasi
- Leslie S. Bradford
- John K. Chan
- Ahmed YoussefAgha
- Joyce F. Liu
- Luis Rojas-Espaillat
- Shannon N. Westin
- Arantzazu Barquín García
Institutions
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Avera Health (US)
- Age UK (GB)
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
- California Pacific Medical Center (US)
- New England Cancer Specialists (US)
- Swedish Medical Center (US)
- Swedish Medical Center (US)
- MaineHealth (US)
- Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid (ES)
- Hospital Quirónsalud Barcelona (ES)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- HM Hospitales (ES)
- GlaxoSmithKline (Canada) (CA)
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (ES)
- MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (ES)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center (US)
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Published
- 2026-08-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.07.023
- Primary Topic
- PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- GlaxoSmithKline