Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: Findings from cohort C of the OPAL phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND: Despite therapeutic improvements in advanced ovarian cancer (aOC), prognosis remains poor for patients with residual disease after cytoreductive surgery. Reported here are results from cohort C of the phase 1b/2 OPAL study of a neoadjuvant poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor for aOC. METHODS: Eligible adults with newly diagnosed stage III/IV homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) aOC and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 were randomized 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane chemotherapy (platinum-taxane) or niraparib. During the prescreening period, patients received 1 run-in cycle of carboplatin-paclitaxel. After neoadjuvant therapy, patients with an unconfirmed complete/partial response (CR/PR) or stable disease per RECIST could undergo interval debulking surgery (IDS), followed by adjuvant platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy. After adjuvant therapy, patients without progression received niraparib-based maintenance treatment. Primary endpoint was pre-IDS unconfirmed investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST. Secondary endpoints included safety. RESULTS: Of 36 patients randomized, 19 received niraparib and 17, platinum-taxane. Baseline demographics and characteristics were similar between arms. Overall, the pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR was 31.6% (CR/PR, 0/31.6%) with niraparib and 70.6% (CR/PR, 0/70.6%) with platinum-taxane. The pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR (80% CI) difference was -39.0% (-56.8% to -17.7%), favoring platinum-taxane. The trial was closed early for futility. Grade ≥3 adverse-event rates during the neoadjuvant period were 42% and 59% in the niraparib and platinum-taxane arms, respectively. No fatal serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed HRd aOC, neoadjuvant niraparib did not improve ORR versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy, and the trial was discontinued. The safety profile was consistent with those of previous PARP inhibitor studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gynecologic Oncology
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.07.023
Primary Topic
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: Findings from cohort C of the OPAL phase 2 trial

Brunella Felicetti, Evi Bakirtzi, Lucía González Cortijo, Xing Zeng et al.
Gynecologic Oncology
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
article

Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: Findings from cohort C of the OPAL phase 2 trial

Brunella Felicetti, Evi Bakirtzi, Lucía González Cortijo, Xing Zeng, Ana Godoy Ortiz, J Belotte, Raúl Márquez Vázquez, Fernanda B. Musa, Diane Provencher, Vishvajit Aghera, Dan-Arin Silasi, Leslie S. Bradford, John K. Chan, Ahmed YoussefAgha, Joyce F. Liu, Luis Rojas-Espaillat, Shannon N. Westin, Arantzazu Barquín García
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite therapeutic improvements in advanced ovarian cancer (aOC), prognosis remains poor for patients with residual disease after cytoreductive surgery. Reported here are results from cohort C of the phase 1b/2 OPAL study of a neoadjuvant poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor for aOC. METHODS: Eligible adults with newly diagnosed stage III/IV homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) aOC and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 were randomized 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane chemotherapy (platinum-taxane) or niraparib. During the prescreening period, patients received 1 run-in cycle of carboplatin-paclitaxel. After neoadjuvant therapy, patients with an unconfirmed complete/partial response (CR/PR) or stable disease per RECIST could undergo interval debulking surgery (IDS), followed by adjuvant platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy. After adjuvant therapy, patients without progression received niraparib-based maintenance treatment. Primary endpoint was pre-IDS unconfirmed investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST. Secondary endpoints included safety. RESULTS: Of 36 patients randomized, 19 received niraparib and 17, platinum-taxane. Baseline demographics and characteristics were similar between arms. Overall, the pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR was 31.6% (CR/PR, 0/31.6%) with niraparib and 70.6% (CR/PR, 0/70.6%) with platinum-taxane. The pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR (80% CI) difference was -39.0% (-56.8% to -17.7%), favoring platinum-taxane. The trial was closed early for futility. Grade ≥3 adverse-event rates during the neoadjuvant period were 42% and 59% in the niraparib and platinum-taxane arms, respectively. No fatal serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed HRd aOC, neoadjuvant niraparib did not improve ORR versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy, and the trial was discontinued. The safety profile was consistent with those of previous PARP inhibitor studies.

Gynecologic OncologyVol. 212
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Avera Health (US), Age UK (GB), McGill University Health Centre (CA), California Pacific Medical Center (US), New England Cancer Specialists (US), Swedish Medical Center (US), Swedish Medical Center (US), MaineHealth (US), Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid (ES), Hospital Quirónsalud Barcelona (ES), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), HM Hospitales (ES), GlaxoSmithKline (Canada) (CA), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (ES), MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (ES), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (ES)
GlaxoSmithKline
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.