Biocoke: Role of surface energy in binding char with coal during coking and the effect of char on coke pore size

The incorporation of biomass-derived char into coking coal is attracting increasing interest as a decarbonisation strategy; however, its influence on coal behaviour during carbonisation and the resulting coke structure remains insufficiently understood. This study investigates the role of surface energy in coal–char interactions during pyrolysis and examines the effect of char addition on the pore structure of coke. The rheological behaviour of two Australian bituminous coals of differing rank, a medium-volatile coal (MVC) and a high-volatile coal (HVC), with vitrinite contents of 73.6 % and 77.2 %, respectively, was analysed to map their viscoelastic pathways and understand bubble evolution during pyrolysis. MVC exhibited a relatively high viscosity (>10 5 Pa·s) within its liquid-like state, enabling stable bubble growth before coalescence. In contrast, HVC exhibited a lower viscosity (3 × 10 4 Pa·s), resulting in unstable bubbles that collapsed shortly after nucleation. Surface energy measurements obtained using the film flotation method revealed that MVC possessed a surface energy of 57 mJ m⁻ 2 during the bubble growth stage, whereas HVC exhibited a substantially lower value of 41 mJ m⁻ 2 . Notably, bagasse char produced at 800 °C exhibited a surface energy of 57 mJ m⁻ 2 , matching that of MVC. Optical microscopy confirmed that approximately 95 % of this char was incorporated into MVC, compared with only 64 % incorporation in HVC. These observations suggest that surface energy matching promotes wetting and interfacial bonding between coal and char during coking. Micro-CT analysis and pore size characterisation further demonstrated that char addition substantially reduced the pore size distribution and overall porosity of both coals, resulting in denser coke structures. These findings demonstrate that surface energy compatibility and coal viscoelastic behaviour play important roles in coal–char interactions, pore development, and ultimately coke strength, thereby advancing the substitution of fossil coal with renewable carbon in ironmaking applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.141026
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biocoke: Role of surface energy in binding char with coal during coking and the effect of char on coke pore size

U.P. Eyibio, Karen M. Steel, Michael T. Heitzmann, Joan S. Esterle
Fuel
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Biocoke: Role of surface energy in binding char with coal during coking and the effect of char on coke pore size

U.P. Eyibio, Karen M. Steel, Michael T. Heitzmann, Joan S. Esterle
article en

Abstract

The incorporation of biomass-derived char into coking coal is attracting increasing interest as a decarbonisation strategy; however, its influence on coal behaviour during carbonisation and the resulting coke structure remains insufficiently understood. This study investigates the role of surface energy in coal–char interactions during pyrolysis and examines the effect of char addition on the pore structure of coke. The rheological behaviour of two Australian bituminous coals of differing rank, a medium-volatile coal (MVC) and a high-volatile coal (HVC), with vitrinite contents of 73.6 % and 77.2 %, respectively, was analysed to map their viscoelastic pathways and understand bubble evolution during pyrolysis. MVC exhibited a relatively high viscosity (>10 5 Pa·s) within its liquid-like state, enabling stable bubble growth before coalescence. In contrast, HVC exhibited a lower viscosity (3 × 10 4 Pa·s), resulting in unstable bubbles that collapsed shortly after nucleation. Surface energy measurements obtained using the film flotation method revealed that MVC possessed a surface energy of 57 mJ m⁻ 2 during the bubble growth stage, whereas HVC exhibited a substantially lower value of 41 mJ m⁻ 2 . Notably, bagasse char produced at 800 °C exhibited a surface energy of 57 mJ m⁻ 2 , matching that of MVC. Optical microscopy confirmed that approximately 95 % of this char was incorporated into MVC, compared with only 64 % incorporation in HVC. These observations suggest that surface energy matching promotes wetting and interfacial bonding between coal and char during coking. Micro-CT analysis and pore size characterisation further demonstrated that char addition substantially reduced the pore size distribution and overall porosity of both coals, resulting in denser coke structures. These findings demonstrate that surface energy compatibility and coal viscoelastic behaviour play important roles in coal–char interactions, pore development, and ultimately coke strength, thereby advancing the substitution of fossil coal with renewable carbon in ironmaking applications.

FuelVol. 429
The University of Queensland (AU)
Australian Coal Industry’s Research Program, Centre of Excellence in Engineered Quantum Systems, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.