Comparative Evaluation of WCLV (1.2344), Uddeholm Unimax, and Uddeholm QRO 90 Supreme Tool Steels for Die Forging

This study presents a comparative evaluation of the wear performance of three hot-work tool steels—WCLV (1.2344), Uddeholm Unimax, and Uddeholm QRO 90 Supreme—for die forging applications. The materials were characterized in terms of hardness and bulk chemical composition using Vickers hardness testing and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Tribological behavior was investigated using ball-on-disc tests, while industrial performance was assessed by analyzing forging punches after the production of 16,250 components. Surface degradation was quantified using optical profilometry and three-dimensional roughness parameters. Measured hardness values were 591 HV for WCLV, 622 HV for QRO 90 Supreme, and 639 HV for Uddeholm Unimax. The average friction coefficients were 0.88, 0.92, and 0.77, respectively. Unimax also exhibited the lowest volumetric wear, reaching 0.04683 mm3 (R19 mm) and 0.03384 mm3 (R22 mm), compared with 0.08646–0.13095 mm3 for WCLV and 0.09598–0.13635 mm3 for QRO 90 Supreme. This corresponds to approximately 45–70% lower wear relative to the other steels. Industrial trials confirmed improved surface stability of Unimax punches after service. The observed trends are consistent with differences in alloying content and the expected microstructural response associated with chromium and molybdenum additions. Overall, Uddeholm Unimax demonstrated the most favorable balance of hardness, friction behavior, and wear resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19163526
Primary Topic
Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of WCLV (1.2344), Uddeholm Unimax, and Uddeholm QRO 90 Supreme Tool Steels for Die Forging

Vít Černohlávek, Artur Meller, Stanisław Legutko, Adam Patalas et al.
Materials
Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
article

Comparative Evaluation of WCLV (1.2344), Uddeholm Unimax, and Uddeholm QRO 90 Supreme Tool Steels for Die Forging

Vít Černohlávek, Artur Meller, Stanisław Legutko, Adam Patalas, Piotr Siwak, Maciej Wąsowicz
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of the wear performance of three hot-work tool steels—WCLV (1.2344), Uddeholm Unimax, and Uddeholm QRO 90 Supreme—for die forging applications. The materials were characterized in terms of hardness and bulk chemical composition using Vickers hardness testing and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Tribological behavior was investigated using ball-on-disc tests, while industrial performance was assessed by analyzing forging punches after the production of 16,250 components. Surface degradation was quantified using optical profilometry and three-dimensional roughness parameters. Measured hardness values were 591 HV for WCLV, 622 HV for QRO 90 Supreme, and 639 HV for Uddeholm Unimax. The average friction coefficients were 0.88, 0.92, and 0.77, respectively. Unimax also exhibited the lowest volumetric wear, reaching 0.04683 mm3 (R19 mm) and 0.03384 mm3 (R22 mm), compared with 0.08646–0.13095 mm3 for WCLV and 0.09598–0.13635 mm3 for QRO 90 Supreme. This corresponds to approximately 45–70% lower wear relative to the other steels. Industrial trials confirmed improved surface stability of Unimax punches after service. The observed trends are consistent with differences in alloying content and the expected microstructural response associated with chromium and molybdenum additions. Overall, Uddeholm Unimax demonstrated the most favorable balance of hardness, friction behavior, and wear resistance.

MaterialsVol. 19(16)
Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem (CZ), Fabryka Armatur Swarzędz (Poland) (PL), Poznań University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.